To: concretebob
I object most to the inclusion of the term "Degrading Treatment or Punishment". I don't see how one would extract intel from a prisoner thru degradation. Wouldn't the subject just get pissed off? Doesn't seem to be a very good inducement to talk, but it would be a very enticing reason to call in the ACLU types to wail about "abuse". I can just see terrorist scumbags complaining about their "feelings being hurt" by wearing handcuffs and leg irons. We'd never be able to even question one of these dirtbags if they saw an interrogator look at them "funny".
Pretty soon there would be no sense in even taking prisoners.
43 posted on
11/10/2005 7:54:38 PM PST by
PleaDeal
(Bill Whittle for Pres. in '08)
To: PleaDeal
Of course these techniques work. We have saved thousands of American lives this way.
Pass this amendment, and throusands of Americans will die to ensure the comfort of some of the most vicious terrorists on the face of the earth.
Is it worth your life to please the liberals and McCain?
44 posted on
11/10/2005 8:01:34 PM PST by
JCEccles
To: PleaDeal
Pretty soon there would be no sense in even taking prisoners. BINGO! We have a winner! That is the ultimate solution.
I don't give a rat's a$$, what stupid dildo dems say, putting underwear on a scumbag's head is NOT torture.
65 posted on
11/12/2005 11:54:54 PM PST by
Auntie Dem
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson