Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ml1954

"If they were really concerned about impaired drivers and highway accidents, injuries, and deaths, they'd be advocating stringent tests on reaction time (to get a license) and vision (to get a license)."

I support that fully. Blue hairs NEED tested! OH and I require Valid proof of ID too on that note ;)

"They'd also be vigorously lobbying for laws about cell phone usage"

Some places have seen those laws already, more need them. I support them too.

"might impair"

Are you saying that acohol is not proven to impair? Interesting useof the word "might".

"They'd be advocating that people with medical conditions that might interfere with their ability to drive should not get licenses. "

I do.

I still do not advocate prohibition of alcohol.


260 posted on 11/11/2005 5:47:50 PM PST by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: BlueStateDepression
If you want to address a specific statement and not shotgun a response to cut and pasted excerpts of what I wrote I might respond.
263 posted on 11/11/2005 5:51:34 PM PST by ml1954 (NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson