Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil Company Executives Defend Profits
Yahoo! News ^ | 11/9/05 | H. JOSEF HEBERT

Posted on 11/09/2005 7:16:55 AM PST by libertarianPA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last
To: libertarianPA

Are they going to drag in the Google execs next? Their profit and operating margins are twice that of "Big Oil".


81 posted on 11/09/2005 10:19:12 AM PST by gore_sux (and so does Xlinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gore_sux

I don't see any other alternative. We have to stop prosperity in its tracks.


82 posted on 11/09/2005 10:25:15 AM PST by libertarianPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

When was the last time you considered less than 10% profit "gouging"?

Company..............Profit..........Sales.........% Profit
Exxon Mobile......$ 9.92 B.....$ 100.7 B.....9.9%
Shell....................$ 5.37 B.....$ 76.44 B.....7.0%
BP.......................$ 6.53 B....$ 65.76 B......9.9%
Chevron...............$ 3.60 B....$ 54.46 B......6.6%
ConocoPhillips.....$ 3.80 B.....$ 49.66 B......7.7%
Marathon.............$ 0.77 B.....$ 17.25 B......4.5%

All are third quarter 2005 numbers.


83 posted on 11/09/2005 10:30:39 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Conservatives recognize the benefits of free trade and a free market.

We also recognize monopolies and oligopolies.

In the oil industry you have a situation where an external dichotomy at the hands of a few oligarchs is common. It’s not a free and open competitive market. Get the 7th grade competition based economics model out of your head! We’re not talking grain farmers here.

Red6


84 posted on 11/09/2005 10:39:48 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA
How dare we try and discipline ourselves

My point exactly. I don't need the nanny-execs to discipline my gas use.

And stocking up (or hoarding as you call it) on a product when it's on sale is bad how? When Kmart had coffee for 1.99 a big ol' can, I bought 20 cans. Is that stocking up, hoarding, or just plain wrong of me to take advantage of a sale? The same way I took advantage of lower out-state gas prices on my 3 state fun trip (right after Katrina, btw?) Did the gas co's want me to stay home, and deprive 3 states of all the $$ I spent?

OK, perfessor, go to it! :)

85 posted on 11/09/2005 10:40:11 AM PST by blu (People, for God's sake, think for yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

But their earnings didn't meet expectations? /sarcasm


86 posted on 11/09/2005 10:43:14 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tares

87 posted on 11/09/2005 10:45:30 AM PST by petercooper (The Republican Party: We Suck Less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: blu

It's a shame your economic education is limited to your transactions at KMart.

I could go over the concepts of supply and demand for you, but you probably wouldn't get it. I'd rather you go through life blaming others everytime something bad happens.

Blame the oil execs. Go on thinking that they're "doing something to you." That's the easy answer. Don't bother to learn how economics works. I don't want to overwork that brain of yours. You need as much as you can to keep those legs moving, I'm sure.


88 posted on 11/09/2005 10:45:47 AM PST by libertarianPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: thackney
When was the last time you considered less than 10% profit "gouging"?

Never. These profit percentages show that, in fact, the oil companies are NOT gouging. Many business make much larger profit margins.

89 posted on 11/09/2005 10:46:19 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Red6

We're also not talking monopolies or oligopolies here. Get the liberal philosophies out of your head.


90 posted on 11/09/2005 10:48:11 AM PST by libertarianPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
But XOM has not added to exploration

That is not true. ExxonMobil is expanding the exploration and production of heavy oil on the North Slope. Oil companies are continually expanding. Oil fields naturally deplete and produce less oil each year without expansion. They have to increase production through new wells or additional facilities just to stay even.

91 posted on 11/09/2005 10:49:54 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

And most people fail to recognize that independently owned gas stations set their own prices, not the oil companies. All over the country you can see the same brand with drastically different prices 20 miles apart. It is not that the oil companies hate Alliance Ohio but like Sebring Ohio, it really is market forces. Which is why prices suddenly dropped to match surrounding areas when a new big gas station started in Alliance Ohio in the past couple months.


92 posted on 11/09/2005 10:55:44 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Excellent point. Exxon actually OWNS only 7% of the Exxon stations in this country. So, it's hardly dictating the price at market.


93 posted on 11/09/2005 11:04:50 AM PST by libertarianPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
But XOM has not added to exploration, or to building plant

A little further information:

ExxonMobil continued its active investment program in the third quarter, spending $4.4 billion on capital and exploration projects, bringing the year-to-date spending to $12.4 billion, an increase of $1.7 billion versus 2004. Our disciplined project management systems remain a competitive advantage, delivering new supplies of crude oil to the global market.

ExxonMobil Announces Estimated Third Quarter 2005 Results

94 posted on 11/09/2005 11:09:31 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: All

And at the same time, the US government and state government have had huge increases in royalty payments for their 12.5% or whatever deal they make, plus additional tax revenue. We should be asking congress what they are doing with the additional revenue to increase production in the US. I know Alaska is trying to invest the surplus into the Alaska Gas Pipeline to bring more Natural Gas production to the US. Who else is helping?


95 posted on 11/09/2005 11:12:50 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: LearnsFromMistakes

I was hoping for the "David Oman Natural State Area."


96 posted on 11/09/2005 11:15:44 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

They split up AT&T and have tried to do the smae to Microsoft.


97 posted on 11/09/2005 11:20:20 AM PST by WesternPacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Are you trying to be funny?

Red6


98 posted on 11/09/2005 11:55:01 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Lib, dahling, that answer was way beneath you. I am surprised.


99 posted on 11/09/2005 12:11:04 PM PST by blu (People, for God's sake, think for yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: thackney

.....But XOM has not added to exploration.......
That is not true. ExxonMobil is expanding the exploration and production of heavy oil on the North Slope. Oil companies are continually expanding...........

I'm sorry if my post was misleading. Yes they're spending on capital and exploration, but not in line with their earnings and cash flow increases.

From their 10Q filing of 11/5:
Nine month:
Net Income $25.4 Bil an increase fromm 2004 by $8.5 Bil

Capital Expenditures $9.9 Bil an increase by 1.3 Bil

Exploration expenses $635 Mil vs 2004 $789 mil.

Share buyback $18.5 Bil, up from 2004 by $7.9 Bil

So, while net income is up 50%; capital spending is up 15%, exploration expenses are down; and shareholder buyback has increased by 75%.

Perhaps future expenditures will change this picture, but at this point I don't see any huge increase in re-investment in oil infrastructure.


100 posted on 11/09/2005 12:16:54 PM PST by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson