If the government has proof that an individual Muslim has broken the law, I have no problem with nailing the SOB.
you are Muslim, by default you are a jihadist which makes you a purveyor of terrorism against the infidel commanded by Allah.
Until and unless a Muslim actually violates the law, this point is irrelvant, even if it is true.
If you don't somehow support (publicly or privately) this core tenet you are not a true Muslim.
Who is and isn't a true Muslim is irrelevant to this discussion.
If you know any Muslim who says he doesn't support jihad is a liar or not a true Muslim.
Unless I have evidence to the contrary, if someone tells me that they are a Muslim and that they do not support jihad, I have no reason not to believe them.
The real test comes when you ask him to convert to a religion or belief that promotes peace not death, war, murder, and destruction of others. If they don't then the odds are that they are lying about their claims of being for peace.
Nonsense. Why should a law-abiding Muslim in any way be pressured to convert religions?
You are treating people like liberals do- you seem to think of people as members of a group first, individuals second.
YOu are naive and ignorant about Islam and how Islam is implemented in Islam-dominated/ruled countries.
No use in educating those who refuse to do their homework.
FC