Any criticism or alternative theory is to be discreditied via a religious smear. Unable to explain your precious evolution on a molecular level, unable to prove your theory of macroevolution, unable to state evolution in a LAW, you resort to personal invective and castigation.
I'm only an ex-Catholic, not a real one, but perhaps you might want to consider there are quite a few Christians who don't regard the Reformation as a good thing? :-)
Try reading about science from sources other than Jack Chick.
Edited for irony.
The funny thing is, you creationists/IDers claim to be awfully fond of letting local communities decide whether or not to teach evolution.
Them when the people of a community reject your political agenda and show your pet politicians the door, you throw a hissy fit.
Absolutely LOL. At you, not with you.
First you say this "Always nice to see you secular, anti-christ, anti-american neo-darwinist zealots are alive and well. With you wackos at the helm the Reformation never would have occurred!"
followed by:"Unable to explain your precious evolution on a molecular level, unable to prove your theory of macroevolution, unable to state evolution in a LAW, you resort to personal invective and castigation"
Seems you like to resort to personal invective and castigation as well. Have you considered reading what you post for internal inconsistency?
Any criticism or alternative theory is to be discreditied via a religious smear. Unable to explain your precious evolution on a molecular level, unable to prove your theory of macroevolution, unable to state evolution in a LAW, you resort to personal invective and castigation.
Trying for the record of how many things you can get wrong in a single post?
Hint, you could add; "a circle is not an ellipse, planets move in wildly elliptical orbits, etc. If you really really try, you may beat the record.