Peer review always has critics, even among real scientists. There's politics in every human institution.
What bothers me is the constant clanging among otherwise intelligent people to accept supernatural explanations at every difficult turn in the road.
The default position of ID is if I can't explain it, Goddidit. It's short attention span science.
ID as "short attention span science"
I like it :-)
That doesn't even bother me. It only bothers me when people try to classify the supernatural as science. I don't have any problem with creationists who are willing to admit the science isn't on their side (I've been good friends with a few who fall under this category, one of whom was a very competent physicist). I'll concede to any creationist right away that I can't prove the earth wasn't created 6000 years ago with the appearance of billions of years of age & evolution...