Harvey started off with an admittedly tough question for Minnich: “are there objective, quantitative measures for design?” This is a hard question for Minnich to answer because Minnich’s arguments were analogical. But that doesn’t mean the evidence for ID couldn’t be there, and Minnich replied that the argument is more intuitive than quantitative. Other ID proponents (like Dembski) might make more quantitative arguments, but Minnich’s arguments are more analogical in nature.
To paraphrase Minnich -- "I don't have any evidence for ID, and I don't know of any methodology for locating any evidence for ID. But that doesn't mean the evidence for ID couldn't be there. Somewhere. Maybe Dembski has some."
ID circle jerk:
Dembski: "I dont have any, maybe Behe has some."
Behe: "I dont have any, maybe Minnich has some."
Minnich: etc...