"The Man Who Knew," chronicles John O'Neill's story on Frontline, PBS.
"'The Man Who Knew' also chronicles O'Neill's increasing frustration with Washington's lax attitude toward the threat posed by bin Laden, including the possibility that Al Qaeda sleeper cells were already operating within the United States."
Also. .
"An analyst at the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency resigned in protest after the attack on the USS Cole because his warnings of pending terrorist acts in the Persian Gulf region went unheeded......(Washington Times, 10/26/00)"
I believe that is the case where his boss, et al. dismissed his warnings as, "Aw, he's just trying to make a former girlfriend in the office look bad."
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39f80b472b74.htm
See also, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=18175
and http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1110088/posts?page=13
footnote. The analyst "had dated a woman who wrote an astounding incorrect analysis the month before the Cole bombing, arguing that terrorists were not capable of conducting a small boat attack on a ship. DIA higher-ups said he pushed his analysis to contradict that of his ex-girlfriend. In reality, Fallis had developed a unique methodology that led him to conclude an al Qaeda attack was imminent."
It ain't just Able Danger, it's everywhere.
Washington's "it all counts towards thrity" crowd sure don't like them unique methodology thingies.
ping....
bttt