Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Voters Approve Ban on Gay Marriage
AP ^ | 11/08/05 | David Crary

Posted on 11/08/2005 6:16:27 PM PST by AlaninSA

Texas voters Tuesday overwhelming approved a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, making their state the 19th to take that step. In Maine, however, a proposal to repeal a new gay-rights law was trailing in early returns.

The contest in Texas was decided quickly _ the ban was receiving more than 74 percent of the votes in early returns. Like every other state except Massachusetts, Texas didn't permit same-sex marriages previously, but the constitutional amendment was touted as an extra guard against future court rulings.

The campaign had been enlivened over the past week because of a controversial tactic by the amendment's opponents, who argued in recorded phone calls to voters that the measure is so poorly worded that it could jeopardize traditional man-woman marriages. Amendment supporters denounced the effort as misleading.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: deviants; fags; gaymarriage; gaywrongs; glbt; homo; homos; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; lesbians; perversion; perverts; prop2; proposition2; propositiontwo; proptwo; queer; queers; samesexmarriage; sexualdeviants; steersandqueers; texas; yesgoodforyoutexas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last
To: AlaninSA

way to go texas.......now get ready for the liberal name calling.


121 posted on 11/09/2005 5:14:07 AM PST by fatteddy (teddy Kennedy .............should be in jail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlaninSA

More good news this morning.


122 posted on 11/09/2005 5:31:26 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tickmeister
I wish people would quit talking about gay marriage. The ban is on same sex marriage, it doesn't matter the sexual orientation of the two people.

I wish they'd stop calling it "marriage." Whatever it is, it sure as hell ain't marriage. Maybe "sodomage" would be better.

123 posted on 11/09/2005 5:34:04 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
Pitiful turnout, 58,000 out of 1.1mill registered. 0.02%

That was the number of early votes.

124 posted on 11/09/2005 5:35:24 AM PST by houeto (Mr. President, close our borders now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AlaninSA
Check the SOS of Texas link - take a look at the Peoples Republic of Travis County. Thank God they're not representative of the state as a whole.

Thank God we ended up buying in Williamson County. We have wonderful, kind, God-fearing neighbors here. Nary a hateful Anti-Bush sign to be seen.
125 posted on 11/09/2005 5:47:23 AM PST by Zechariah_8_13 (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance
I'm a Houstonian. Will be in Austin for 'Horns v KS Sat.

For all my enthusiastic embracing of all things Texas and Longhorn (yes, I'm a season tick holder--Sec 101!!), I don't believe I have seen a more stirring photo of our remarkable Capitol.

THANK YOU! You made my day, amigo!

Best to you and yours.

126 posted on 11/09/2005 5:53:55 AM PST by Airborne Longhorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u
Makes me proud to be a Texan!

I need to move out of Austin and into Texas then. All three bond amendments passed. This will raise my property taxes. I will officially be paying more on taxes and insurance than I am on the mortgage payment itself.

127 posted on 11/09/2005 6:04:50 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Anyone who needs to be persuaded to be free, doesn't deserve to be. -El Neil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased

Actually, more like 534,350 against Prop 2, including 81,100 in the Peoples' Republic of Austin.


128 posted on 11/09/2005 6:23:19 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909
being a Louisiana domiciliary

Have you repented?

129 posted on 11/09/2005 6:49:58 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AlaninSA

Johnson county (south of Ft Worth) checking in with 16,216 for Marriage and 2,152 for Gays.

24% turnout.

Dont mess with Texas.


130 posted on 11/09/2005 7:22:12 AM PST by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlaninSA

What happened with the Pledge of Allegiance language in Texas...I heard that failed or are my liberal friends yanking my chain?


Here's what they said:" The pledge of allegiance was rejected today in Texas. Voters decided that they don't want liberty & justice for all."


131 posted on 11/09/2005 7:38:03 AM PST by SideoutFred (Save us from the Looney Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

I knew Prop 2 would not be defeated in Texas but I went on to vote to help drive the numbers up and send a clear message to Travis County Republik.


132 posted on 11/09/2005 7:38:33 AM PST by daybreakcoming (May God bless those who enter the valley of the shadow of death so that we may see the light of day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

NO. Louisiana is good. We have boudin, Abita beer, chicks with hot Cajun accents, and a superior Civilian legal system.

A very large chunk of the Louisiana Democratic voting base was also purged recently, just in case you didn't notice.


133 posted on 11/09/2005 8:06:58 AM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: tickmeister

I believe Scalia said just as much in answer to an equal protection claim.


134 posted on 11/09/2005 8:37:41 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rapture-me

"If God decided to give Texas an Enema, which County do you suppose He would choose to put the hose in?"

El Paso.

/rimshot/


135 posted on 11/09/2005 8:43:45 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: AlaninSA

Once again, TEXAS RULES!!!


136 posted on 11/09/2005 8:48:19 AM PST by lormand (Dead people vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

Is that the total including the early voters?


I'm still for deportation to California or even France


137 posted on 11/09/2005 8:54:12 AM PST by Rightly Biased (Valor is a Gift.Those having it never know for sure whether they have it till the test comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: AlaninSA
Voters Reject White Settlement Name Change
Associated Press via nbc5i.com (Dallas/Ft. Worth) ^ | 8:33 pm CST November 8, 2005 | Staff
Posted on 11/09/2005 12:12:11 PM CST by Paleo Conservative

138 posted on 11/09/2005 10:32:42 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey hey ho ho Andy Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlaninSA
"In Maine, however, a proposal to repeal a new gay-rights law was trailing in early returns."

This is why the AP SUCKS.

The article is about a state issue but the AP can NOT help themselves trying to "balance" a conservative vote with something that sounds liberal. A Maine vote to repeal a previous law is totally irrelevant.

The AP sucks. We need to create national news agency that has some journalistic ethics.
139 posted on 11/09/2005 10:37:34 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

Speaking of the Houston Chronicle, they got it wrong again. This morning's paper said that the reason the Proposition was on the ballot was to make it harder for future legislators to change the law. Although that may be part of it, the reason it was put on the ballot was to prevent people from Mass. or elsewhere where it may become legal from suing under the full faith and credit clause. The Chronicle article didn't even mention that.


140 posted on 11/09/2005 10:41:46 AM PST by half-cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson