Actually my scientific knowledge is extensive and thorough, despite your bland claims to the contrary.
Mendel and Darwin were not the founders of the scientific revolution, you ahistorical hick.
I'm referring, of course, to the likes of Newton, Hooke, Kelvin, Linnaeus. Not that I expect you to have heard of them.
I realize that Darwisinistas think any bloviating statement they make to advance their cause is ipso facto science, but I must insist on using a more traditional standard; in other words, things are not true just because you state them or wish them to be so. I know, I know, there I go with the mysticism again...