OK, let me explain. From the point of view of a biologist who does not believe in God or higher spiritual order, the man are just one of many animal species to which the same rules of racial divergence apply.
I do not have problem with that since I believe that God used the "clay" of natural processes to imprint the image of Himself in human beings. This act of God makes man different from dog. If you think that science supports this biblical view but do not want to show how it is fine with me.
From the point of view of a biologist who does not believe in God or higher spiritual order, the man are just one of many animal species to which the same rules of racial divergence apply.
You've gone way off the original statement you made that I first responded to. You've distanced yourself from it and you cannot bring yourself to state explicitly what you plainly implied in it.
You are attempting to attack science by asserting it is directly or indirectly racist yet you won't provide any hard evidence, only vague indirect implications. I'm through going around in circles in this discussion unless you support your claim with some hard evidence.
BTW, biology does not support any racial theories among dogs, cats, fish, humans, etc. Race is a political/sociological/superficial concept.