It has much in common with evolution. Both are based in feelings rather than facts.
You have it backwards. According to Michael Behe, if you adopt a normal definition of science, evolution is science and ID is not. And if you expand your definition of science to include ID, you have to also include astrology.
Those are the words of ID's leading scientific mind.
Thanks for the ping!
Good. It's about time. The episcopacy of pseudoscience is finally going to be exposed to the light of truth from more than one direction. The dogma of evolution, itself untennable as evidenced by the multiple foundational changes in the last century and disagreement even today among leading evolutionists, will be shown to be held on faith and can eventually be discarded along with Ptolemy's spheres.