Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: frankjr
She tells Ross that she had no journalistic obligation to prove the authenticity of the documents before including them in the "60 Minutes II" report.

I can see the mouths of editors and publishers across the nation just drop when they read that line. And then they lean over andspeed dial their lawyers to arrange another little talk to their reporters about the legal ramifications of words like "libel", "defamation", "slander", and "absence of malice".

14 posted on 11/08/2005 1:52:00 PM PST by theDentist (The Dems have put all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: theDentist
She had no journalistic obligation to prove the authenticity of the documents - I am just guessing here but she may want to leave that off of her resume.
36 posted on 11/08/2005 2:03:15 PM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson