Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/08/2005 7:14:38 AM PST by Carl/NewsMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 last
To: Carl/NewsMax
Clinton said the terror trade-off wasn't worth it.

Which explains his inaction from '93-01..

199 posted on 11/09/2005 3:35:53 PM PST by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Is there video of this? This will end up in an Anti Hillary ad in 08.

Look for the testicle lock box to be deployed again soon.

201 posted on 11/09/2005 5:37:38 PM PST by lawnguy (It works Napoleon, you don't even know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
"When we got real tough on visas... we lost a lot of brains.

When we got real loose on visas, we lost the incentive to educate our own brains.

-PJ

203 posted on 11/09/2005 5:51:44 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Ex-president Bill Clinton is arguing that tighter immigration laws are hurting America, saying the new restrictions aren't worth it even if they stop the "one out of a zillion [foreigners] who might have a bomb."

This is worth keeping handy when Hildebeast runs for President. It's absolutely priceless in a time when Americans are extremely concerned about our open borders. Is he suggesting the potential death of Americans (unknown quantity) by a bomb is not worth stopping the continued traffic of illegals?

213 posted on 11/09/2005 8:04:11 PM PST by MamaDearest (" Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
It's not fair to slam old Bill on his immigration statement after all he's an ex-president and can do nothing.

We shouldn't jump him unless we are ready to jump President Bush who has the exact same position on open borders and is using his power as our President to carry on and expand Bill Clinton's former immigration policy

So I ask those of you who jump on those of us that criticize Bush's open border policy, how is it right when President Bush does it and wrong when Bill Clinton does it?

You might want to ask the same question on a number of different issues that they seem to handle the same way.

Like spending like drunken sailors and increasing the size of the Federal government.

Funding and giving legitimacy the terrorist groups like the PLO and Hamas and pressuring Israel to evict their people give up their land and security so that terrorists who seek their total destruction can have a state to use for a beachhead and staging area.

There are a number of other areas where their political views seem to be in in alignment such as foreign aid, base closings and creating a smaller military while playing Global Cop for big business interests.

217 posted on 11/09/2005 9:28:56 PM PST by mississippi red-neck (You will never win the war on terrorism by fighting it in Iraq and funding it in the West Bank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Wow! Yikes! One of the most darwin-award-winning statements by a former US president!

New tagline:


220 posted on 11/10/2005 7:08:12 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March ("We might have dodged a bomb but we lost a lot of brains." Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
We might have dodged a bomb but we lost a lot of brains."

I think Bubba lost his brains a long time ago.

How I hate that man.

232 posted on 11/10/2005 9:49:00 AM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Bill the big thinker. What a guy.


233 posted on 11/10/2005 9:50:09 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
"we have nowhere near the number of illegal alien voters necessary to elect the missus without digging into the dearly departed"

Voter fraud, again!


© 2000 WorldNetDaily.com

Stop the presses! I mean it. Stop the election!

Something is going on in Washington and California that will have a great impact on tomorrow's election -- and it stinks to high heaven.

Let me start by telling you how I found out about it.

A very good friend of mine, who shall remain nameless, has a long-time live-in housekeeper from Guatemala. The housekeeper has a daughter who just turned 18. The immigration status of both mother and daughter has been pending for years. Papers have been filed with the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Hearings have been held. But they are not citizens.

This is very important: The daughter has not registered to vote.

But, a few days ago, the 18-year-old got a very attractively packaged "Dear friend" letter from Bill Clinton, paid for by the California Democratic Party.

Here's what it said (on one side in Spanish and on the other side in English): "While every election is important, the November 7th election will determine our future for the next decade, and beyond. The stakes are high for America's Latino families. And California is the critical battleground.

"That's why I'm writing. We need your help to elect a Democratic Congress.

"Despite our strong economy, many hard-working people still struggle to make ends meet. Quality, affordable health care, a world-class education, aging with dignity, and well-paid jobs are part of the American dream -- rather than an American reality -- for too many people.

"Electing a Democratic Congress is essential for our 'Families First' legislative agenda.

"Congratulations on your decision to register. Registering to vote is a basic responsibility of citizenship that far too many people ignore.

"Now that you are registered ...

 

  • "Can I count on you to vote Democratic on November 7th?

     

  • "Will you make an extra effort to elect Democrats to Congress -- and to your State Legislature -- by talking to your family, friends and neighbors?

"Remember: Your Vote is Your Voice.

"Su Voz, Es Su Voto. Make your voice heard on Election Day.

"Sincerely, President Bill Clinton"

Below that letter is a P.S. that explains: "Here is your personal Voter Identification Card. Sign your name, then detach your card. Bring your card with you to your polling place on Election Day. It will help your voting go more smoothly."

Apparently all the recipient needs to do with this Voter Identification Card is sign it to be eligible to vote. Keep in mind, this was sent to a previously unregistered voter.

As my friend points out, only the U.S. government knows her age and pending residency status, and, obviously her Latino background. How did this information wind up in the partisan political hands of the California Democratic Party? And what kind of impact will a mailing like this -- obviously utilizing a government database for political purposes -- have on the California legislative races? How widespread is this fraud?

This is making my head spin. The recipient of this letter happens to live in congressional and state legislative districts that are very hotly contested in Southern California. But this appears to be a statewide mailing from the Democratic Party headquarters in Sacramento.

It's mind-boggling. The fraud is so blatant. Yet, not a peep out of the Republicans. They apparently won't even know what hit them. The polls in recent days show them making big gains in this once-invulnerable Al Gore stronghold state. A mass mailing like this effectively registering tens of thousands of potential Democratic voters days before the election is a secret weapon held back deliberately to avoid detection, scrutiny and publicity. After the election, the party will be happy to pay a fine for any illegalities involved. Clinton will be out of office and untouchable as always. There will be a new regime in at the INS. And it will all be swept under the rug.

And who knows if this technique is not being deployed by other state Democratic Party units? I don't doubt it for a minute.

This is voter fraud, pure and simple. And those responsible include the president of the United States, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, possibly the Census Bureau and certainly the California Democratic Party.

I'm outraged. Are you?




SENATORS FOR VOTE FRAUD

By ARNOLD ALHERT

 

October 19, 2002 -- IT'S more than a little ironic. On the same day it was announced that Saddam Hussein has been "unanimously" re-elected, the only two senators preventing a unanimous vote in the Senate on the election-reform bill were New York's own Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton.

Why? "This would make it more difficult to vote in New York. It's designed to suppress minority voting participation," said Sen. Clinton.

The "this" Sen. Clinton is referring to is the new anti-fraud provisions in the bill. They require that every person wanting to vote show a driver's license, Social Security number or other approved ID in order to cast a ballot.

Clinton and Schumer preferred a system where a potential voter merely had to sign his or her name.

So who is it exactly that this bill is "suppressing"? U.S. citizens have all the requisite ID - no matter what their ethnicity. Could it be that Clinton and Schumer are "sensitive" to some of the leftist fringe groups in this country who are clamoring for the right of illegal aliens to vote?

It is no secret that New York is home to thousands of undocumented "residents" - who would vote overwhelmingly Democratic if they could just get past these darn ID requirements.

New York's dynamic duo have a lot more 'splainin' to do on this one.

E-mail: ahlert@mindspring.com


245 posted on 11/11/2005 1:53:46 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson