Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservativecorner

What were the specific instructions given to Fitz? The info on his web site is quite general and certainly wouldn't get in the way of investigating Wilson, CIA folks (say Val for starters) and much more of the MSM. Since Fitz and his supporters claim that he is such an upstanding, neutral bulldog, why did Fitz so limit his investigation? How many times did Fitz have contact with ANY CIA employee? Why did Fitz take TWO years to come up with esentially nothing? Answer no real questions?


4 posted on 11/08/2005 6:27:26 AM PST by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paladin2

I suspect Fitzgerald limited his investigation to the immediate leak-related matters because he didn't want to live the job of special counsel for the rest of his life. You see how long it took to investigate this small aspect of things (albeit - the press participation had to be compelled via taking the matter all the way to the SCOTUS + Judith Miller's 85 days). The question I have is with regard to what triggers there are for the AG to appoint another special counsel - to pursue the many aspects of the CIA's (institutionally and individually) back-stabbing of the administration. In the case of the Plame matter - all it took was a letter from the CIA to AG Ashcroft. What is necessary to start the ever so slowly rolling ball on the CIA?


10 posted on 11/08/2005 7:05:26 AM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson