Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ichneumon

i have read them on both sides. what amazes me is how afraid the evolutionists are of any dissent. i have no problem with people presenting their evidence of no creator or that Jesus was a fraud or that the Bible is a fairy tale. bring it on. it's the evolutionists who want to use the courts to silence all dissent or discussion about the issue. most people don't even know the basic assumptions made in using carbon dating to evaluate how old things are. there's a reason the majority of the population does not believe in evolution after a generation of the evolution monopoly in the scientific community. because it's not science.

study the woodpecker alone. no other animal like it. it didn't evolve. it was created.


80 posted on 11/08/2005 8:38:23 AM PST by Snowbelt Man (ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Snowbelt Man
most people don't even know the basic assumptions made in using carbon dating to evaluate how old things are

I do. But perhaps you would like to tell me about them?

Hint: stay away from the creation websites; they are full of nonsense on this subject.

83 posted on 11/08/2005 8:46:12 AM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: Snowbelt Man
i have read them on both sides. what amazes me is how afraid the evolutionists are of any dissent

I teach physical chemistry at the advanced undergraduate and graduate level, and I can assure you, I suppress dissent. People who use equations that are different from those found in the p. chem. books; people who employ 'alternative' definitions of conventional units; people who do 'non-standard' mathematics; all of them are brutally identified with a red pen and punished. Particular egregious dissenters fail the course, and in many cases this can deny them a lucrative career.

84 posted on 11/08/2005 8:49:42 AM PST by Right Wing Professor (If you love peace, prepare for war. If you hate violence, own a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: Snowbelt Man
study the woodpecker alone. no other animal like it. it didn't evolve. it was created.

This is an assertion. Unless you can support it, it is meaningless.
85 posted on 11/08/2005 8:51:35 AM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: Snowbelt Man

Just precisely what is your problem with woodpeckers?


How are they any more unusual than, say, armadillos, staghorn beetles or stinkhorns?


93 posted on 11/08/2005 8:58:41 AM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: Snowbelt Man; Dimensio

HIND LIMB MORPHOLOGY, PHYLOGENY, AND
Yes, woodeckers evolved. I'm offline for a few hours so this will have to do for now:


CLASSIFICATION OF THE PICIFORMES
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:wzzJtQs_dpEJ:elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v098n03/p0466-p0480.pdf+woodpecker+ancestry+evolution+phylogeny&hl=en&ie=UTF-8


Piciformes are woodpeckers.
Kinda technical, unike creationist websites.


99 posted on 11/08/2005 9:13:17 AM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: Snowbelt Man
"study the woodpecker alone. no other animal like it. it didn't evolve. it was created.

Argument from incredulity.

Many have studied the woodpecker, including its tongue, and come to a different and highly educated conclusion.

101 posted on 11/08/2005 9:16:37 AM PST by b_sharp (Please visit, read, and understand PatrickHenry's List-O-Links.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: Snowbelt Man
"most people don't even know the basic assumptions made in using carbon dating to evaluate how old things are

This sounds like a typical Hovindite manipulation of information. What the creationist sites you visit do not tell you can be more important than what they do tell you. In the case of Carbon 14 dating they forget to mention all the calibration techniques and precautions against contamination used. There is a reason they stick to 30 second sound bites. There is a reason they don't tell you everything.

103 posted on 11/08/2005 9:21:35 AM PST by b_sharp (Please visit, read, and understand PatrickHenry's List-O-Links.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson