No offense, but I will take the musings of my uncle over the stuff you guys have been churning out. As far as his being a REAL scientist, he is actually a chemist who invented a drug that gets drug addict un-addicted. I'll take his word over yours.
As my wife said last night...some day we'll all know for sure.
Until then I'm sure the arrogance and scientific elitism will carry you far. I didn't even bother to read your response...I'm sure it's more of the same.
And since you CONTINUE to mention my offhand, sarcastic remark about your eternal damnation (mischaracterized, of course, like a good scientist), I'm going back to the fact that deep down in your SOULS there's a little TWITCH because there's a possibility that you are wrong (theories can be that way), and there's an element of fear.
See ya. (not really)
And thanks to everyone who sent me such nice FReepmails, though you should have been on this thread backing me up.
How do you mischaracterize "you're all f--ked"?
I've no desire to enter into a private debate with you, but I'll gladly debate you in public. "Disprespectful" coming from you, that's a laugh. It is interesting that you perceive my attempts to drag arguments of the slightest substance from you (no success there so far) as "bullying".
No offense, but I will take the musings of my uncle over the stuff you guys have been churning out. As far as his being a REAL scientist, he is actually a chemist who invented a drug that gets drug addict un-addicted. I'll take his word over yours.
Failure to address the actual points I made about what constitutes a scientific theory and why ID fails to make the grade noted. Repeated fallacy of argument from authority of an unnamed third-party noted.
As my wife said last night...some day we'll all know for sure.
Yessss... aaaannnd... we should stop trying to work out how the physical world works in the meantime? That is where ID leads.
Until then I'm sure the arrogance and scientific elitism will carry you far. I didn't even bother to read your response...I'm sure it's more of the same.
I'm just a poor engineer, so I don't understand what your reference to "scientific elitism" is germane to.
So you send me stuff, I respond to you, and you don't even bother to read my response. How rude and militantly ignorant can you get?
And since you CONTINUE to mention my offhand, sarcastic remark about your eternal damnation (mischaracterized, of course, like a good scientist), I'm going back to the fact that deep down in your SOULS there's a little TWITCH because there's a possibility that you are wrong (theories can be that way), and there's an element of fear.
Ah, the marvellously effective ARGUMENT BY UPPERCASE. I note that it wasn't just me who took exception to your vile gloating. Committed Christians on these threads have also taken exception to them in public. Repetition of previously rebutted speculation noted.
See ya. (not really)
Insult noted
And thanks to everyone who sent me such nice FReepmails, though you should have been on this thread backing me up.
I really enjoy getting backup mails from lurkers. Which position of yours were they supporting? Was it the militantly ignorant refusal to learn, the refusal to state your best arguments against evolution, or was it the threats of eternal damnation?
Come on guys, post in public, don't let Cato down.