Of course it is, just as 'we all decended from fish, so even though there are large gaps in logic and it seems stupid, we don't want to hear anything else.'
Once again, a creationist lies about the substance of the ToE. By now, we should be used to this.
What is the actual, logical reason that ID should not be MENTIONED in schools?
I never said it shouldn't be mentioned in schools. Of course it should.
ID should be mentioned in science classes only to be debunked. Because it's not even vaguely scientific. Students should be shown why treating pretending that it's science is silly.
ID should also be mentioned in history classes, preferably in the context of Soviet "ideological-outcome science." Because that's exactly what it is - ignoring evidence that doesn't serve the ideology.
ID belongs in philosophy and comparative religion classes. Not anywhere else.
If you can reduce ID to what you wrote, why can't I sarcastically reduce your THEORY to what I wrote?
Okay, so what does the science teacher say to debunk ID in Science class (dumb it down so I can understand it [that was sarcasm])?
I'd be careful what I say about the Soviet Union, because I've been resisting saying that you and the ACLU are on the same side on this one.
Two more questions, as I'm getting bored with this:
1. Does your side need to ignore any evidence to make the TofE plausible?
2. What evidence do we ignore?