[Coyoteman]

The Discovery Institute praised the changes, Luskin said, "because they expand the information presented to students about biological and chemical evolution by including some of the scientific criticisms of these theories."

...they also rewrite the definition of science, holding that it no longer is limited to searching for natural explanations for natural phenomena.

Scientific criticisms? Like:

ID is the result of embracing all the evidence, including the statistical probability evidence. Creationism has never denied a single shred of evidence, and no evidence ever found has in any way undermined special creation. The genitic code is a guiding plan to specifically prevent evolution, and it works really well [post #194, this thread].

I can hardly wait.

[VadeRetro]

Creationism has never denied a single shred of evidence.

Evidence for alternate universes.