Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur; Señor Zorro

For the purpose of this kind of discussion, it doesn't make any difference what the writers of Joshua really meant. We know from historical records that for at least 2000 years it was interpreted to mean that the sun revolves around the earth. We know this from the writings of people like Martin Luther.

We also know that other Biblical writings have been reinterpreted over the ages, just as Genesis will evntually be reinterpreted. Reality trumps the vanity of people who think they are the only true interpreters.


229 posted on 11/08/2005 3:29:19 PM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]


To: js1138; Non-Sequitur
No, it said what the sun did. It stood still in the heavens and the moon remained in place for an entire day. The only explanation is that the writers of Joshua believed the sun revolved around the earth.

Then the weatherman who says "the sun set" must also believe in astronomy pre-Copernicus? Once again, it is merely describing how things looked from the observer's point of view. Due to that description you somehow get to what the writers of Joshua "must" have believed. Quite a leap. Reality trumps the vanity of people who think they are the only true interpreters.

Truth is absolute "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." John 3:18.

"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John14:6

470 posted on 11/12/2005 12:08:14 AM PST by Señor Zorro ("The ability to speak does not make you intelligent"--Qui-Gon Jinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson