Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor
" Thank you for being deliberately dense."

I knew exactly what you were saying, but you obviously didn't realize the irony in your statement.

"ID is the result of embracing all the evidence, including the statistical probability evidence. Creationism has never denied a single shred of evidence, and no evidence ever found has in any way undermined special creation. The genetic code is a guiding plan to specifically prevent evolution, and it works really well."

Not one true sentence in that paragraph. 1) There is no *statistical probability evidence*; all such nonsense is no more than numbers pulled out of the posterior of the alleged mathematicicans. 2) Creationism has never met a piece of evidence it didn't have to discard or distort in order to fit with Genesis. ALL the evidence is against creationism. 3) The genetic code is the clinching piece of evidence for common descent; it makes no sense at all under creationism (ERV's and such). 4) There is nothing in the genetic code to stop Natural Selection from producing new species; there is no magical *genetic break* stopping a population from continuing to diverge.

Try reading a little more on the subject before embarrassing yourself so badly.
225 posted on 11/08/2005 3:12:57 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: CarolinaGuitarman

One wonders how statistical probability differs from probability.


240 posted on 11/08/2005 4:22:38 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson