To: editor-surveyor
" Thank you for being deliberately dense."
I knew exactly what you were saying, but you obviously didn't realize the irony in your statement.
"ID is the result of embracing all the evidence, including the statistical probability evidence. Creationism has never denied a single shred of evidence, and no evidence ever found has in any way undermined special creation. The genetic code is a guiding plan to specifically prevent evolution, and it works really well."
Not one true sentence in that paragraph. 1) There is no *statistical probability evidence*; all such nonsense is no more than numbers pulled out of the posterior of the alleged mathematicicans. 2) Creationism has never met a piece of evidence it didn't have to discard or distort in order to fit with Genesis. ALL the evidence is against creationism. 3) The genetic code is the clinching piece of evidence for common descent; it makes no sense at all under creationism (ERV's and such). 4) There is nothing in the genetic code to stop Natural Selection from producing new species; there is no magical *genetic break* stopping a population from continuing to diverge.
Try reading a little more on the subject before embarrassing yourself so badly.
225 posted on
11/08/2005 3:12:57 PM PST by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
To: CarolinaGuitarman
One wonders how statistical probability differs from probability.
240 posted on
11/08/2005 4:22:38 PM PST by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson