Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal lawsuit could follow board vote [Evolution in Kansas & Dover]
Lawrence Journal-World [Kansas] ^ | 08 November 2005 | Joel Mathis

Posted on 11/08/2005 4:17:17 AM PST by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540541-560 next last
To: PatrickHenry
I was an uncle 35 years ago. Now I'm a GREAT uncle!

Beware, mortal!

521 posted on 11/15/2005 8:15:23 AM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
I was an uncle 35 years ago. Now I'm a GREAT uncle! Beware, mortal!

As I scan my family tree, I observe that I've got numerous great-great uncles. They're dead now, but they can still whip your butt. Mind your place!

522 posted on 11/15/2005 8:23:20 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
They're dead now...

Me and my uncle killed them for sport.

523 posted on 11/15/2005 8:36:38 AM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Evolution makes testable predictions about the natural universe, has established falsification criteria and is based upon observed physical evidence, not simply conjecture...

In your dreams, Dimensio. Evolution is unscientific because it can never be proved by science to be true. It is not happening at present and without a time machine, one can never be sure that it happened in the past.

Evolutionists have "Physics Envy." They tell the public that the science behind evolution is the same science that sent people to the moon and cures diseases. It's not.

The science behind evolution is not empirical, but forensic. Because evolution (supposedly) took place in history, its scientific investigations are after the fact—no testing, no observations, no repeatability, no falsification, nothing at all like physics. And this is just what the public discerns — that evolution is just a bunch of just-so stories disguised as legitimate science.

Scientists are normal, flawed human beings. They are as capable of prejudice, covetousness, pride, deceitfulness, etc., as anyone.

524 posted on 11/15/2005 9:01:09 AM PST by music_code (Atheists can't find God for the same reason a thief can't find a policeman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: music_code
Evolution is unscientific because it can never be proved by science to be true.

NOTHING in science can be "proved" to be true. You have been told this before. Did you forget, or are you just lying?
525 posted on 11/15/2005 9:07:02 AM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I am an uncle.

... to a monkey!

< /flaming anti-Evo humor mode>

526 posted on 11/15/2005 9:12:33 AM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: longshadow

What can I say? It runs in the family.


527 posted on 11/15/2005 9:30:54 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman

You're in. Put up the cash and we'll compare notes. I just noticed that Thatcherite is in the UK, so I'd like to suggest that the charity be RAFA, the RAF Association, of which my late Father-in-law was a member. If all you brilliant scientists want to pony up, I would love to see them get several grand.


528 posted on 11/15/2005 9:47:34 AM PST by ModernDayCato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

So you're all in? Do you need an address to mail the checks?


529 posted on 11/15/2005 9:48:28 AM PST by ModernDayCato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Actually, Jenny, the uncle issue is a little less gray than the ID issue and WAY more annoying, so I thought I would start there.

In the meantime I've been becoming more educated on the ID/Neo-Darwinism debate, and while it is mildly interesting, I continually get both bored and overwhelmed, because it would be great to find a magic bullet that would put one theory above the other. I participated in a debate on another forum which I enjoyed, and I've been trading emails with a lot of intelligent people who make compelling arguments.

It is blatantly obvious that there is an amazing degree of scientific elitism on the evolution side of this issue. There is way more here on FR than anywhere else, and while I asked for, received and discussed facts and refutations, I have no interest in posting them here. It was definitely interesting and educational, but it would be wasted here.

So ID/evolution goes on the same trash heap with fiscal responsibility, CFR, Federalism and all the other stuff that I get tired of discussing on this board.

530 posted on 11/15/2005 10:00:05 AM PST by ModernDayCato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: ModernDayCato

I think you're missing something very important in this whole *uncle* business. :)


531 posted on 11/15/2005 10:06:02 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio

This is a disingenuous response, an evasive maneuver on your part. It pretends that there is no more burden of proof required for the fantastical "theory" of evolution than there is for something repeatable, demonstrable, and falsifiable, like say, lighting methane bubbles and watching them rise in the air as I saw last night on Letterman. The claims made by evolutionists are much more akin to "Alice-in-Wonderland" adventures than anything remotely resembling true science.


532 posted on 11/15/2005 10:51:13 AM PST by music_code (Atheists can't find God for the same reason a thief can't find a policeman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies]

To: music_code
This is a disingenuous response, an evasive maneuver on your part.

No, it is a means of pointing out that you apparently do not understand how science works and as such are holding the theory of evolution to a standard that no scientist holds any scientific explanation.

It pretends that there is no more burden of proof required for the fantastical "theory" of evolution than there is for something repeatable, demonstrable, and falsifiable,like say, lighting methane bubbles and watching them rise in the air as I saw last night on Letterman.

You are making an invalid comparison. You are comparing a scientific theory with observed events. Observed events are not theories. Observed events are used as the basis for theories and indeed observed events are the basis for the theory of evolution, however observed events on their own explain nothing and as such are not theories. Theories are attempts to explain why observed events occured. For example, the explanation for why lightning methane bubbles come to exist in the first place would be "theory" and it would be held to the same standard of evidence as would the theory of evolution.

I should also note that you are using presumptive language when speaking of the "fantastical" theory of evolution, which may indicate to some an unwillingness to actually learn about the subject.

The claims made by evolutionists are much more akin to "Alice-in-Wonderland" adventures than anything remotely resembling true science.

Perhaps you could provide specific examples to support this assertion?
533 posted on 11/15/2005 10:55:08 AM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: music_code
Evolutionists have "Physics Envy."

LOL!!

This is ironic considering the current mess physics is in and how well biology is doing.

The mysterious attraction towards the sun (MATS) being experienced by the Pioneer spacecraft was so unexpected, the Planetary Society has decided to jump in and move the discussion along.

The accelaration of faraway galaxies was not only not predicted by any theory, there's still no good speculation, much less a proposal.

There's that mysterious "dark matter" consisting of "WIMPS" or "MACHOS". More data looking for a theory.

Then there's those mysterious gravity waves. $100's of millions later and there's still not a shread of evidence.

Last, but not least, there's that string theory. No particles to be found, barely a wisp of evidence of rolled up microscopic dimensions, and the thing has to be renormalized for each use.

I'm sure the biologists are all dropping what they're doing to get involved.

On the other hand - and I don't know if you're a creationist or ID'er, as long as it's anti-science you guys are OK - you guys have all these billion year old human fossils in your basement that you're not willing to show anyone. Trot out some of your evidence that mammals appeared before trilobites. We're all waiting to see it.

/sarcasm

534 posted on 11/15/2005 11:05:15 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: ModernDayCato; Thatcherite; CarolinaGuitarman; VadeRetro; PatrickHenry; longshadow; Dimensio

In the meantime I've been becoming more educated on the ID/Neo-Darwinism debate, and while it is mildly interesting, I continually get both bored and overwhelmed, because it would be great to find a magic bullet that would put one theory above the other. I participated in a debate on another forum which I enjoyed, and I've been trading emails with a lot of intelligent people who make compelling arguments.

Stirrings of a crisis of confidence in his position?

It is blatantly obvious that there is an amazing degree of scientific elitism on the evolution side of this issue. There is way more here on FR than anywhere else, and while I asked for, received and discussed facts and refutations, I have no interest in posting them here. It was definitely interesting and educational, but it would be wasted here.

So ID/evolution goes on the same trash heap with ... all the other stuff that I get tired of discussing on this board.

<sigh> And thus ModernDayCato cuts & runs - even before we find out exactly what it was that he was challenging Thatcherite to! That is worse than junior-high. That is elementary school quality.

Note to ModernDayCato: The manly thing to say would be something like: "In the meantime I've been becoming more educated on the ID/New-Darwinism debate, and I have to admit that I don't understand this stuff quite as well as I thought I did. I still think you evoFreepers are acting as scientific elitists, but we'll just have to agree to disagree for now."

535 posted on 11/15/2005 11:59:31 AM PST by jennyp (WHAT I'M READING NOW: Art of Unix Programming by Raymond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

So, you think you are Pudge Hefflefinger (sp?), qv.


536 posted on 11/15/2005 12:08:34 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]

To: Thatcherite

Don't you automatically lose when you cry uncle?


537 posted on 11/15/2005 12:12:21 PM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: balrog666

I think he was on Art Bell the other night.


538 posted on 11/15/2005 12:14:32 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
...and while I asked for, received and discussed facts and refutations, I have no interest in posting them here.

LOL. Stuff that would be wasted here sounds like stuff that has already been wasted here.

539 posted on 11/15/2005 12:19:16 PM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: js1138
LOL. Stuff that would be wasted here sounds like stuff that has already been wasted here.

More like waste that has already been stuffed here.

540 posted on 11/15/2005 12:53:43 PM PST by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540541-560 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson