Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court Gone Mad! [9th Circuit DOES IT AGAIN]
http://www.grasstopsusa.com/sh110605.html ^ | http://www.grasstopsusa.com/sh110605.html

Posted on 11/07/2005 10:49:48 PM PST by davidosborne

Court Gone Mad! 9th Circuit Court Rules Against Parents By Sharon Hughes

The new ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals stating, "There is no fundamental right of parents to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children...Parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students," has Californians in an uproar, and rightfully so! The liberal ninth district court known for it's legislating from the bench, such as in the recent case where the court ruled the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional because it contains the words 'under God', dismissed a lawsuit by California parents on November 3, 2005 who were sued the school district because a sex survey with inappropriate, nosey questions was given to children in the first, third and fifth grades. The survey was administered by the Palmdale School District and asked students questions such as if they ever thought about having sex or touching other people's "private parts" and whether they could "stop thinking about having sex. Other questions in the survey involved:

Touching my private parts too much

Washing myself because I feel dirty on the inside

Not trusting people because they might want sex

Getting scared or upset when I think about sex

Having sex feelings in my body

Can't stop thinking about sex

Getting upset when people talk about sex

The parents argued that they have the sole right "to control the upbringing of their children by introducing them to matters of and relating to sex." But the three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit dismissed their case with Judge Stephen Reinhardt writing for the panel, "no such specific right can be found in the deep roots of the nation's history and tradition or implied in the concept of ordered liberty."

Can you believe this? It is absolutely outrageous! And if that weren't enough...The superintendent of the California school district involved in the 9th Circuit Court ruling questioned the motives of the parents involved in the case.

The same day House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi sided with the ninth court opposing a Republican plan to split the liberal, San Francisco-based court in two. The Democrats are not happy that this made it's way into a must-pass House budget reconciliation bill.

This is no small matter. Just because their rulings are so over the top doesn't mean they won't set precedence that could make it harder and harder for pro-family Americans to win cases involving other constitutional laws and violations. The Ninth Circuit is the largest of all the U.S. circuit courts covering nine states.

This only highlights the importance of what kind of judges sit on the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court.

© Sharon Hughes 2005

Sharon is the President of The Center for Changing Worldviews, and hosts Changing Worldviews TALK Radio which is heard Monday, Wednesday and Friday on KDIA AM1640 San Francisco/Vallejo; Saturdays KGDP AM660 Santa Maria WITA AM1490 Knoxville, TN, as well as online daily at Oneplace.com. Her column appears on several online news sites. She maintains a blog at http://changingworldviews.blogspot.com.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; 9thcircus; stephenreinhardt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 11/07/2005 10:49:49 PM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

What does it take to impeach them all? Is there any recourse citizens have to remove these judges?


2 posted on 11/07/2005 10:58:49 PM PST by Wolfhound777 (It's not our job to forgive them. Only God can do that. Our job is to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne; JennieOsborne; /\XABN584; 3D-JOY; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; 1Peter2:16; ...

I know this is not the FIRST post on this matter.. but I found this article interesting...


3 posted on 11/07/2005 10:59:53 PM PST by davidosborne (www.DavidOsborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
inappropriate, nosey questions was given to children in the first, third and fifth grades.

First grade is way too you for kids to be thinking and talking about sex. Why plant ideas in their minds at that age?

4 posted on 11/07/2005 11:04:32 PM PST by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting
Oops, typo. Try that again.

First grade is way too young for kids to be thinking and talking about sex. Why plant ideas in their minds at that age?

5 posted on 11/07/2005 11:05:51 PM PST by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting

If the 9th CIRCUS has their way YOU as parent have no right to decide that question for your child...


6 posted on 11/07/2005 11:07:46 PM PST by davidosborne (www.DavidOsborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wolfhound777
What does it take to impeach them all? Is there any recourse citizens have to remove these judges?

The president actually can abolish courts to some degree. I do not remember the specifics but Thomas Jefferson did it in 1802.
7 posted on 11/07/2005 11:08:24 PM PST by msnimje ("People for the American Way have issued a Fatwah against Alito" --- John Cornyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting
First grade is way too young for kids to be thinking and talking about sex. Why plant ideas in their minds at that age?

They need to do a deep background check on the person who initiated this to see if they are a pedophile.
8 posted on 11/07/2005 11:09:37 PM PST by msnimje ("People for the American Way have issued a Fatwah against Alito" --- John Cornyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

What the heck, one more article about this freaking sick insanity won't hurt.

Later pingout.


9 posted on 11/07/2005 11:10:34 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting

1st? God, I remember being in 5th grade waaaaay back in 1985 and questions like that would have led to beffudlement even then...that was when kids my age were still trying to figure out if being called a viring was an insult or not (and even the kids throwing it around as a perjorative didn't know!).


10 posted on 11/07/2005 11:11:54 PM PST by ECM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1515957/posts

House panel OKS provision to divide 9th Circuit Court
The Washington Times ^ | 11-04-05 | WestVirginiaRebel


11 posted on 11/07/2005 11:13:28 PM PST by davidosborne (www.DavidOsborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

I wonder what DU is saying about this.

I have found so many on DU to be frightfully naive - they are socialists, hate Bush, yadda yadda yadda, and then they are amazed at things like Kelo vs. New London or people losing their rights to socialism.

Not most of them, of course, but enough to make me shake my head. I bet a few of them are quite upset at this and can't figure out how it happened.


12 posted on 11/07/2005 11:13:45 PM PST by I still care (America is not the problem - it is the solution..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

13 posted on 11/07/2005 11:15:19 PM PST by davidosborne (www.DavidOsborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
The new ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals stating, "There is no fundamental right of parents to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children...Parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students,"

The only words that come to mind other than, "sickos", is, "HOMESCHOOL YOUR CHILDREN, OR FIND A PRIVATE SCHOOL THAT RESPECTS THE RIGHTS OF PARENTS!".

14 posted on 11/07/2005 11:17:20 PM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chena

One of MANY reasons why we homeschool...


15 posted on 11/07/2005 11:21:37 PM PST by davidosborne (www.DavidOsborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ECM
called a viring

Okay, I will bite, what is a viring?

16 posted on 11/07/2005 11:24:43 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=\\Nation\\archive\\200511\\NAT20051104a.html

Dems Oppose Republican Move to Split the Ninth Circuit
By Susan Jones
CNSNews.com Senior Editor
November 04, 2005

(CNSNews.com) - On a day when another "activist" ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals had conservatives fuming, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi stood up for the court, opposing a Republican plan to split it in two.

A Republican proposal to split the liberal, San Francisco-based Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has made its way into a must-pass House budget reconciliation bill, much to Democrats' dismay.

The Ninth Circuit covers nine states and is the largest of all U.S. circuit courts. Nicknamed the "Ninth Circus" by conservative critics, it is the same court that ruled the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional because of the phrase "under God."

Earlier this week, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled that parents have no "fundamental right' to protest what public schools tell their children about sex. The case stemmed from a sex survey given to elementary school children in Palmdale, Calif.

The conservative group Focus on the Family called Wednesday's ruling "one of the most abhorrent examples of judicial tyranny in American history."

But on Thursday, House Minority Leader Pelosi said Republicans, in trying to split the Ninth Circuit, are attacking "an independent judiciary."

"On the merits, there is no justification for the Republican court splitting proposal. It is simply a partisan exercise to appease the radical right," Pelosi said in a press release.

Pelosi said the move to split the court would come at "tremendous cost" to U.S. taxpayers. "This proposal is simply unacceptable, and I will continue to oppose it," she added.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) this week warned House Republicans not to include split-the-court language in the budget reconciliation bill. She said the split would be unfair, because a newly configured Ninth Circuit would have many more cases per judge than a newly created Twelfth Circuit.

Moreover, Feinstein said, a court-splitting provision has nothing to do with the budget and therefore should not be included in the budget bill. She said she would raise a point of order if the language were included.

The Senate Judiciary Committee is considering a proposal to split the Ninth Circuit in two, something that would require President Bush to appoint more judges.

The new Ninth Circuit would include California, Hawaii, Guam, and the North Marianas Islands, while the new Twelfth Circuit would cover Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and Alaska.


17 posted on 11/07/2005 11:26:16 PM PST by davidosborne (www.DavidOsborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
a Republican plan to split the liberal, San Francisco-based court in two


Who would appoint the new judges? Would there be new judges?
18 posted on 11/07/2005 11:26:44 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Your children are blessed to have parents who are willing to take on the challenges of homeschooling. We did so as well, and it was the best gift we ever gave them.


19 posted on 11/07/2005 11:29:00 PM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

5 entries found for virion.
vi·ri·on ( P ) Pronunciation Key (vr-n, vîr-)
n.
A complete viral particle, consisting of RNA or DNA surrounded by a protein shell and constituting the infective form of a virus.




[vir(us) + -on1.]

[Download Now or Buy the Book]
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.


vi·ri·on (vr-n, vr-)
n.

A complete viral particle, consisting of RNA or DNA surrounded by a protein shell and constituting the infective form of a virus.


Source: The American Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary
Copyright © 2002, 2001, 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.


Main Entry: vi·ri·on
Pronunciation: 'vI-rE-"än, 'vir-E-
Function: noun
: a complete virus particle that consists of an RNA or DNA core with a protein coat sometimes with external envelopes and that is the extracellular infective form of a virus


Source: Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary, © 2002 Merriam-Webster, Inc.


virion

n : (virology) a complete viral particle; nucleic acid and capsid (and a lipid envelope in some viruses)


Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University


virion

virion: in CancerWEB's On-line Medical Dictionary


20 posted on 11/07/2005 11:29:20 PM PST by davidosborne (www.DavidOsborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson