I don't know that it has been established that he turned over the notes (the pages faxed from CIA that had the names "Wilson" and "Joe Wilson" handwritten on them). Those pages did not mention Wilson by name, and the indictment makes no assertion that those note had any mention whatsoever of "Wilson't wife."
This whole thing is confusing...and there could be a personal reason for his involvement...but, I want there to be a jury trial...and I want the defense attorney to put as many of the Washington "elites" on the stand that he can.
It's not that confusing. People just naturally gravitiate to the "covert/not-covert" angle, even though in the perjury case, the underlying action is literally irrelevant. Libby's counsel has promised a vigorous defense.
Does anyone know if Vallely will be on Sean's TV show tonight? Sometimes his radio guests double up for the TV show the same night.
As long as I have you around to set me straight when I get things jumbled in my head and in my posts here on FR...
I know that I will be fine!! You amaze me...how you put things in their place and make the complicated, easier to understand...
Thank you!!!
It is the old classified v covert ploy. If you can't get him on one, go for the other. Who told what to whom first. Crazy.