Exactly. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution tells why we will never see anything like this from muslims in the USA. Unless, or until, they reach a "critical mass" that emboldens them. That being said, if we don't take measures to prevent this critical mass from accruing, through immigration limitations and reform, it could happen. Then, all bets are off, but it would become open season on muslims, with no "bag limit"...
Actually, they have already reached "critical mass" in parts of France. In the rioting districts, they're >70% of the population, sometimes more. In many others, they're 30-50%. That's way too many.
An American history professor who teaches U.S. ethnic history once noted that one of the contributing factors to the American Revolution was the heavy immigration in the 18th century, much of which was from parts of the British realm that owed weaker allegiance to King George -- lots of Germans from the electorate and its dependencies, lots of Scots and Scots-Irish. Plus a very high colonial birthrate: women in America were having seven to nine children each. Ethnic turnover => political overturn.
It doesn't even have to be ethnic. Peru lost the Tacna District of southern Peru when miners revolted against the Peruvian government. They were Chileans, mostly, and their attachment to Peruvian law and customs was slim to nil. "The flag tends to follow the people."
Texas in 1820-1836, same story.
Lesson the U.S. will eventually learn to our own sorrow.
You can't be Fred Rogers with strangers. It doesn't work.
"The Second Amendment of the US Constitution tells why we will never see anything like this from muslims in the USA."
Think again, the moment you raise a gun to a muslim, regardless of what the muslim is doing, you will promptly be arrested for a hate crime and the muslim will become an instant hero.