Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay bishop attacks Catholic stand (Episcopal Vicki Gene attacks the Pope)
BBC ^ | November 6, 2005 | BBC

Posted on 11/06/2005 11:31:58 AM PST by Heatseeker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: SeniorMoment
"What the hell is church good for???"

That about sums it up!

Gene Robinson and Rowan Williams may wear fancy livery and speak in stained-glass affectations, but they are not in the business of Christianity.

IMHO, I think the Lord is shaking things up in organized churchianity to see who is true and who is not. The last days may be closer than we realize.

61 posted on 11/06/2005 10:06:01 PM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

"Translating the Bible into vernacular was NEVER a heresy."

Oh, I know, I was being flippant in my use of "heresy." (Although there was a "heresy" squabble about an unauthorized version.) Sorry.

To explain the issue more fully, but still to over-simplify, (you really need a couple of volumes), the Anglicans were a bit too "power to the people" for Rome-at-the-times tastes: this included direct provision of Scipture to the common folk, in the common tounge (one of the several reasons for the "Anglican" moniker), the occassional non-Latin mass (a matter of dispute within the Anglican Church itself, Latin being the official preference), monks and commoners (and married priests) having positions of power, etc.

To get to root cause, it really had to do more with a deep distrust of a distant central authority and the deep-set tradition of monestaries (which were really a Celtic tradition more than a Roman tradition, although that flowed over) than anything.


62 posted on 11/07/2005 6:52:54 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Well, you disagree slightly with the Anglican Church's website (and the old Book of Common Prayer I have that describes the Celtic origin of Anglican Symbols, for that matter).

http://www.anglican.org/church/ChurchHistory.html


63 posted on 11/07/2005 6:57:09 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Thanks for the link, I will look through it.


64 posted on 11/07/2005 7:19:06 PM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11. Restore Hagia Sophia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
Not to be presumptious, but the first sentence of the link seems very wrong: It began in the sixth century in England, when Pope Gregory the Great sent St. Augustine to Britain to bring a more disciplined Apostolic succession to the Celtic Christians.

Augustine was sent to the Saxons and Angles (Pope Gregory reportedly said when he saw pagan Angle slaves that they seemed more like Angels than Angles). The Celtics would NOT proselytise to the Saxons and Angles -- they hated them for kicking the Celts out of England and restricting them to Cymru (Wales) and Cornwall. I don't see how there could be any Celtic influence until the 11th century (when the Normans had made themselves a common enemy to both the Welsh and the Saxons!)
65 posted on 11/07/2005 7:22:04 PM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11. Restore Hagia Sophia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
Not to be presumptious, but the first sentence of the link seems very wrong: It began in the sixth century in England, when Pope Gregory the Great sent St. Augustine to Britain to bring a more disciplined Apostolic succession to the Celtic Christians.

Augustine was sent to the Saxons and Angles (Pope Gregory reportedly said when he saw pagan Angle slaves that they seemed more like Angels than Angles). The Celtics would NOT proselytise to the Saxons and Angles -- they hated them for kicking the Celts out of England and restricting them to Cymru (Wales) and Cornwall. I don't see how there could be any Celtic influence until the 11th century (when the Normans had made themselves a common enemy to both the Welsh and the Saxons!)
66 posted on 11/07/2005 7:22:14 PM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11. Restore Hagia Sophia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

You would be amazed at who goes where when seeking to spread the Word.

Think Jonah and his destination.

But the Celtic influence is obvious just from a archiological (sp!) standpoint --- old Scot and Wales churches and cemetaries typically have the Celtic cross as a prominent part of the designs.

The integration is deeper than you would thnk. Even the Holy Grail/King Arthur bit is, at its heart a Celtic-sourced myth (or maybe not) --- being that Joseph of Aramathia is the (alleged/probable) founder of the Celtic Church --- the Last Supper being in his house, presumably with his dishes, making the story plausible.


67 posted on 11/09/2005 7:42:16 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Heatseeker
"Pope Ratzinger may be the best thing that ever happened to the Episcopal Church."

At least he's retained his sense of humor.

68 posted on 11/09/2005 7:49:53 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson