To: indianrightwinger
For the umpteenth time, Bush said he would fire anyone who criminally leaked Plame's name, not anyone "involved" in the leak. Isn't it ironic how concerned Democrats have suddenly become about the well-being of the CIA and its agents.
9 posted on
11/06/2005 12:32:32 AM PST by
CALawyer
To: CALawyer
Most likely President Bush knew before making that comment that Plame had not been a covert agent while he was President. see post
21
25 posted on
11/06/2005 12:48:59 AM PST by
Zon
(Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
To: CALawyer
The dimwits are utilizing the MSM to continue their brainwashing of the sheeple. On local news we are hearing about how 'Libby was indicted IN the leaking of Plames name'. They cannot say FOR leaking her name. So they substitute IN for FOR and try to give the listener the impression that he was indicted FOR leaking. Lying and brainwashing are the only platform they have now.
To: CALawyer
" Isn't it ironic how concerned Democrats have suddenly become about the well-being of the CIA and its agents. " ....
That only happens when they stand a change to gain from this and use it as a political tool to bring down the President and his administration.
The C.I.A. now is only useful to them if they can use it to their advantage, then after that, they trow them overboard.
To: CALawyer
Agree... Makes it pretty clear who's "animal" the CIA and the FBI have become...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson