We can only go by what you write. What you posted was incorrect. Ergo, it matter not one whit what you "meant" to post; what matters, is what you DID post.
I know that you weren't born here and that all of this is a bit more difficult for you, but we just can't let errors sit out there, uncorrected on threads, now can we? Lots of people read FR and we all must try to keep FR looking the best it can.
Yes, there are still some RINOS in the Senate. Unfortunately, we need them, to maintain the majority. No Conservative will EVER get elected from most of the states the worst RINOS come from and it is far better to retain the majority we have, than to lose it and have the likes of Harry Reid and Hillary Clinton etc. as the CHAIRMEN of ALL of the committees.
Sure, we all prefer Senate Majority over lack of RINOs.
Toomey was a strong candidate. Not so sure we would have lost the majority with him as a candidate instead of Specter.
McCain is a special case. His brain degenerated since he lost to Bush in the primaries, and is hell bent on creating a name for himself in the NYT editorials.
Snowe and Collins from Maine, I agree.
Chafee is counterproductive. Better have him on the Dem side.
Hagel is puzzling on the WOT/Iraq issues. Otherwise, a strong conservative.
Gordon Smith comes from a liberal state, but strong on most major issues. Calling him Rino would be completely unfair.
Graham is simply press crazy. But, I have not seen him VOTE wrong on major issues.