Skip to comments.
White House urged to 'come clean' in CIA leak case (RATs Gone Wild)
CNN ^
| November 5, 2005
Posted on 11/06/2005 12:19:21 AM PST by indianrightwinger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: Lancey Howard
(laughing)...Libby's trial certainly WOULD set the stage for a major kick in the head for the left, wouldn't it?
I just wish the DC Reps had the stomach for it...:(
To: indianrightwinger
Liberals - They're not just stuck on stupid. They hold the patent
Hmm? Wonder if I should use that as my tagline?
62
posted on
11/06/2005 3:22:10 AM PST
by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.)
To: indianrightwinger
I guess this bunch isn't aware that Paris is burning...
Things are truly surreal with these liberals, they have become paranoid losers.
To: indianrightwinger
"It's been one week since the vice president's chief of staff was indicted, and there are still very serious questions"
Maybe they're serious to DIMbulbs, but to us they are MORON jokes!
64
posted on
11/06/2005 4:40:15 AM PST
by
RoadTest
(God is on the side of those on His side.)
To: indianrightwinger
Its been a while since Md4bush outed Babs and she hasnt come clean yet either. Is she or isnt she?
I think the issue of Mikulski's sexual preference is at least as important as Joe Wilson outing his wife and blaming it on someone else.
By the way Babs, Libby wasnt indicted for leaking information. So what has Bush got to come clean about and why should he fire anyone not indicted.
To: conservative in nyc; kristinn; Congressman Billybob; All
Ping. Maryland demands the Whitehouse come "clean".
And this coming from "Maryland" about coming clean? lol. Check out the MD4Bush/NCPAC threads, as concerns Maryland... and coming clean..
66
posted on
11/06/2005 5:10:29 AM PST
by
Alia
To: Alia
The Dems have found Farrakhan's play-book.
At the 2008 DNConvention... they'll have a landing-pad ready for the 'Mother-ship'.
67
posted on
11/06/2005 5:21:53 AM PST
by
johnny7
(“What now? Let me tell you what now.”)
To: johnny7
And on that mothership, they'll be hoping to see their good friends.. the French, the Belgiums, and of course their best buddies creating riots in France, Denmark, Iraq and Afghanistan; alongside the racialists, the feminists, the homosexualists, and the spinners they call pals in the worldwide MSM.
Yep. Moonbats.
OTOH, they are in a very difficult position; they've just got to believe there's a mothership to rescue them. Their current attempts are coming across as frog-sticking without a flashlight. IMHO, of course.
68
posted on
11/06/2005 5:26:12 AM PST
by
Alia
To: Alia
...IMHO, of course.No need to be humble dude... these people are sh_t-a$$ traitors.
I've been following politics since 1980... and I've never seen the DNC/MSM cabal work more feverishly to bring down the nation.
Al Qaeda is well served.
69
posted on
11/06/2005 5:44:03 AM PST
by
johnny7
(“What now? Let me tell you what now.”)
To: indianrightwinger
Blah blah blah "come clean" blah blah blah "misused and manufactured intelligence" blah blah blah blah
70
posted on
11/06/2005 6:15:03 AM PST
by
manwiththehands
(Big Lie #1: "Islam is a peaceful religion"; Big Lie #2: Bush "lied")
To: nopardons
"Johnson was impeached, but he NEVER was elected president."
Huh? You mean this Johnson? Andrew Johnson, 17th President: 1865-1869.
Am I misunderstanding you?
To: Prophet in the wilderness
"Just wait when the public learns that it was their own, who outed Valarie Plame, and this whole situation was a conspired bogus attack on the President , VP Cheney and Karl Rove out of thin air, and the public learns that the MSM/DEMOCRATS/LIBERALS were complicit and responsible for outing Plame. This whole situation is going to come back and haunt the MSM/DEMS/LIBS and trap them in their own lies, scams, and trickc, and I hope they never recover from it."
Just when is this going to happen.........wake me up when it does, will ya.
72
posted on
11/06/2005 6:20:17 AM PST
by
depenzz
(My tastes are simple, I 'm always satisfied by the best)
To: CyberAnt
Hmmmm?? Is this why we saw Hillary being so chummy with Barbara the last few days .. perhaps giving Barbara a few tips on what to say ..??
"So is this about Sandy Berger, or is this about politics?" asked Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md. July 2004.
I didn't see her concerned about Berger and demanding that the Clinton's "come clean" on what they told him to get rid of. Seems she was willing to accept the "honest mistake" defense.
73
posted on
11/06/2005 6:42:29 AM PST
by
DejaJude
(Life, liberty and the pursuit of those that threaten it.)
To: johnny7
I think the "higher up" players know their time has come to an end, and so much is standing.. revealed. It's the "middle managers" who are suggesting this can all be "hooked and woven" and rebuilt. Higher-ups say, IMHO, "it's worth a shot". Meantime, higher-ups are grokking towards a newer plan to dovetail with the middle management plan. Let's see...
Suspect riots in France and Denmark, massive "anti-US" violent protests in Brazil..ANSWER rallies in the US.. more and more terrorists nailed in Iraq. I think the beast is shrieking in outrage.
74
posted on
11/06/2005 6:43:56 AM PST
by
Alia
To: depenzz
On the Tony Snow show, he was saying how this indictment of Libby is going to come back and haunt them and the MSM.
Tony was giving his own opinion in when Libby goes on trial that all those in the MSM who are involved in this is going to have to testify under oath, and that is when it get really interesting, and they will be sweating.
To: Cindy
You can also find it
here.
76
posted on
11/06/2005 7:07:23 AM PST
by
sono
(That was a metaphor. You DO know what a metaphor is? - Z Miller)
To: indianrightwinger
The Score in the Race to Judgment at the White House
Clinton Democrats:
61 indictments or misdemeanor charges
33 convictions
14 imprisonments
7 independent counsel investigations
72 congressional witnesses pleading the Fifth Amendment
19 foreign witnesses who declined interviews by investigative bodies
17 witnesses fleeing the country to avoid testifying
Bush Republicans:
1 indictment, not even on the primary issue
77
posted on
11/06/2005 8:24:35 AM PST
by
FerdieMurphy
(For English press one. Only in America!)
To: Prophet in the wilderness
Geezzee, if being under oath means like the commander in chief clinton did it, I can't see much happening with a lowely reporter under oath.
78
posted on
11/06/2005 9:05:33 AM PST
by
depenzz
(My tastes are simple, I 'm always satisfied by the best)
To: Zon
I agree. He chose his words very carefully, undoubtedly on the advice of counsel. The instinctive response would have been to say anyone who disclosed Plame's name would be fired.
79
posted on
11/06/2005 10:17:57 AM PST
by
CALawyer
To: msnimje
this WH just can not do it. they leave it up to others . others who will soon tire of the administrations lack of will.
80
posted on
11/06/2005 10:18:00 AM PST
by
fantom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson