What I find so curious (and confusing) is the six day old thread in Breaking News entitled MD4BUSH Identified! In that thread, Ryan O'Doherty, Communications Director of the Maryland Democrat Party is said to be MD4Bush. With all the continued speculation on this thread as to who MD4BUSH really is, it's possible that theory has been debunked.
Maybe someone can clear that up for me. Thanks.
O'Doherty was clearly involved in publicizing Steffen's comments, but the facts do not (yet) demonstrate that he was MD4Bush.
Thanks Quill, I continue to see patterns in the MSM of creating news. I see on Meet the Press this morning a roundtable of journalists quoting polls of how Bush is in such trouble, yet never mention that the sampling of those polls was weighted with 20% more Dems than Reps and if someone claims to be independent, they are more likely to be Dem than Rep. These polls are always skewed and the Media knows it - and the public is becoming aware of it.
I also see "unnamed white house sources" and ananymous sources which seem to say exactly what the media wants them to say. I see the MSM and the Dems intentionally misleading the public about Fitsgerald's investigation, who called for it, and what his finding were - as reported to all of the MSM in front of them and live to the entire country. Yet they continue to mislead.
The MSM is no more than "Hollywood in Fishwrap" and the Republic will fall if we do not have a journalists who will be accountable to truth rather than spin. The Republic will fall because a smaller portion of us get our news from them and eventually the remainder of those who inhale the left spin will be forced to leave the country - as we continue to defeat them more and more at the ballot box and in the courtroom.