Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kstone

This isn't unlikely at all. Different numbers of chromosomes have been found in DNA extracted from Neanderthals. If Neanderthals -- which we know were a specific breeding community -- had that much variation, why couldn't others in the human family tree?


86 posted on 11/05/2005 9:18:44 PM PST by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Alter Kaker
This isn't unlikely at all. Different numbers of chromosomes have been found in DNA extracted from Neanderthals. If Neanderthals -- which we know were a specific breeding community -- had that much variation, why couldn't others in the human family tree?

Actually not all humans have the same number of chrosomes. It's true that the most common variances are associated with retardation, not anomolies prevent reproduction.

88 posted on 11/05/2005 9:22:39 PM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

Good grief! There are different number of chromosomes in MANY humans TODAY (such as in Downs or Klienfelter's syndromes). The issue is not whether differing numbers of chromosome pairs occur. It is whether it is possible to propagate an extrachromosomal or subchromosomal genotype and thereby create a new species.

Thank you for demonstrating that you in fact do not understand the topic.


92 posted on 11/05/2005 9:32:55 PM PST by kstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson