Odd that given the opportunity to debate under oath in an international news forum, the ID advocates chickened out. I suppose that when there is a penalty for lying, ID doesn't debaste so effectively.
There have been numerous devates between the ID school and the Darwinists. The problem is that the Darwinists have not debated homorably in most of those that I have witnessed. I'm sure the issue is format, which has consistently favored the evasive tactics of the Darwinists.