The word "accruing" is irreduciblly complex in English, at least by Behe's methods. One cannot drop any part (except the "g" in some Upper Tier English Society or a few American Dialects.) Thus the word cannot accrue from accrue which in itself is irreducibly complex. Behe hasn't allowed enough transformations.
The whole enterprise is a sham based on the notion that whatever we do not now know we can never know.
The premise of ID is the opposite of science.