No, like when they attempt to assert knowledge beyond that which can be ascertained by the scientific method. Even if you sat down tomorrow in a lab (and I don't think this is possible, but even if it was) and recreated the big bang and and evolved every species that ever was, you will have proved nothing about the past. Science is the study of what is, not what was.
You ever do science, señor? Sure doesn't sound like it.
Check my profile. Most of my background is in an applied science. I probably have a greater than average exposure to science (though I admit that there are many who know more). It is, however, quite interesting that your only response to a valid point was an ad hominem attack. Last I heard, logic was relevant in science...