To: PatrickHenry; Physicist; RadioAstronomer
Please crank up the Ping list (that is, if Darwin Central deems this article worthy).
To: Lurking Libertarian
Does Darwin get to testify?
3 posted on
11/05/2005 11:49:17 AM PST by
samtheman
To: Lurking Libertarian
8 posted on
11/05/2005 12:07:33 PM PST by
VOA
To: Lurking Libertarian
is unfazed by criticism but glad he has tenure. So is Noam Chomsky.
13 posted on
11/05/2005 12:54:10 PM PST by
narby
(Hillary! The Wicked Witch of the Left)
To: Lurking Libertarian
In a nationally watched trial that could determine whether intelligent design can be taught in a public school, the soft-spoken professor had bucked decades of established scientific thought. The trial is about whether there can even be a mention of any alternative to evolution.
To: Lurking Libertarian
Isn't it true, an attorney asked, that Behe's critique of Darwin and support for intelligent design, a rival belief about the origins of life, have little scientific support? Yes, Behe conceded.
That is not what Behe said. ID may not have the suppost of most scientists, but Behe did not say ID did not have significant evidence supporting it.
To: Lurking Libertarian
"I'm the kind of guy who would rather be at home cutting the grass and drinking a beer," he said. "Or grading papers at the university. Anything but this."
Now I know he's also a disingenuous, misspeaking, 'kind of guy'.
32 posted on
11/05/2005 2:50:52 PM PST by
ml1954
(NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads)
To: Lurking Libertarian
He argued that living organisms are so highly complex that an unseen, intelligent designer must have created them. That designer, he said, is God.So he's changed his mind again.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson