So to the Democrats, the term "black" has an entirely different definition. It does not refer to a deeper shade of epidermis, nor to a traceable African genotype. Their definition of "black" is a belief that people of racial minorities need more help than nonminorities to achieve less, and in the glorification of said help. THAT is how Bill Clinton got to be defined as black! I get it now!
"So to the Democrats, the term "black" has an entirely different definition. It does not refer to a deeper shade of epidermis, nor to a traceable African genotype. Their definition of "black" is a belief that people of racial minorities need more help than nonminorities to achieve less, and in the glorification of said help."
I agree totally.
The truth is that many african american individuals and other minorities too are extraordinarily successful in the united states. But rather than encourage these people, or even grant recognition of the facts, the dem party seems engaged in a never ending spiral of wallowing in faux-pity
for the minorities.
This is why you get this virulent criticism of successful african americans. They rain all over the demoCRAP parade and ideology.
Minority success in the United States (From Wikipedia and US Census Bureau):
1. Asian-Americans (Including Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, and South Asian Americans) had a median income of 54999$ per annum.
2. Indeed, according to the U.S. Census Indian-Americans (South Asian Indian) have the highest median income of all ethnic groups (including whites) in the U.S. ($60,093 per annum)
3. Jewish Americans have a median income of 54000$ per annum.
Clearly minorities can and certainly do succeed. But for some reasson the media and the dems never never want to admit it.
From the Houghton Mifflin Co. dictionary:
Racist: One who believes that race accounts for differences in human character or ability.