Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Patriot from Philly
It is demoralizing to be a Bush supporter when he doesn't defend himself.

Bush said he himself was to blame for Katrina.

He called Manslaughter Ted Kennedy a fine Senator.

He let Manslaughter Ted Kennedy have a free will with the first Dept of Education budget--then once Kennedy ballooned it to stratospheric levels, Bush asked for even more money than Kennedy did, even though the RATs shot down Bush's hope for school vouchers.

Bush said he would go after nations that harbor terrorists, yet he lets Iran build the IDEs for Iraq and does nothing about it.

He gave Turkey BILLIONS of dollars after Turkey would not let the 4th Infantry Division enter through Turkey as planned, costing lives of the British and the Americans.

Bush gives $15 billion to Africa, even though we "can't afford" the F-22 and we "can't afford" the military bases.

On and on and on . . . In short, Bush is Mr. Nice Guy in an arena where nice guys finish last. The RATs are waging a brutal frontal assault and all out war against Bush and the Republicans, yet Bush chooses to "reach across the aisle", even though that means getting one's arm amputated by the RATs, and Bush chooses to "have bi-partisan support" for agenda, even though that means a leftist, Marxist agenda.

Bush is too nice. He does not have the focused vision that Reagan had to do what is right for the nation, and screw what the RATs think. The RATs are anti-American opportunists who care only about their own power, not the nation's future--you know that and I know that. Why doesn't George Bush know that?

58 posted on 11/04/2005 2:41:32 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
In short, Bush is Mr. Nice Guy in an arena where nice guys finish last.

My recollection of the past to presidential elections is quite different from yours. In fact it seems to me that he won them both by doing exactly what he is doing now. The darn weakling.

98 posted on 11/04/2005 3:18:29 PM PST by getitright (There's no peace in appeasement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
Ah, I see that you are back to bash Bush. Since I know that you are only 24 years old, you do not have the remotest idea of how Reagan operated or what criticism he took from the right for some of his actions.

In addition, the media has changed since the Reagan era. No longer can a president command air time on the netwowrks without PROVING that his speech will be "newsworthy." They simply refuse to cover the speeches.

President Bush campaigned on bringing a new tone to Washington. He is fulfilling a campaign promise, as well as following scripture, which instructs us to heap praise upon our enemies, which will fall like hot coals upon their heads.

You need to learn patience, and also to learn that there is more going on than meets the eye. Just because you don't see it on TV doesn't mean it isn't happening.

132 posted on 11/04/2005 4:08:44 PM PST by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson