He had admion and dem statements without attribution. that' when the dems balked. they didn't like that.
You are correct - but we're talking about two different things.
I heard Pat talking about the committee hearings they had been having - and how he presented a list of statements (leaving off the author) to the committee - and yes, they were upset because they didn't know who said the statements. Which should prove to anybody with a brain that the dems were only looking for REPUBLICAN statements which they wanted to pick apart.
However, what I'm talking about was AFTER THE REID TANTRUM! I saw Pat on FOX and he said that he had statements by democrats when Clinton was in office which were more compelling than anything Bush or his admin had ever said. He told Brit he planned to put out those statements for the public. That is not what the dems wanted, but they're the ones who said it and now THEY HAVE TO BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT THEY SAID.
Because of that .. Rush put some of the list up on his website. Of course, we on FR have been talking about those statements for years; but we don't expect the MSM to pick up on it.