Origen is generally considered Mr. Allegorical interpretation but that is really too simple an explanation. He "granted to them a sophistication of intention and composition which rose beyond the simple dichotomies of “literal” and “symbolic”.."
or so says the instructor of my creation class.
Would Origenalist Judges take the Constitution as allegory? (Or allergy?)
Origen is generally considered Mr. Allegorical interpretation but that is really too simple an explanation.
Huh? What? I'm not familiar with Mr. Allegorical.