Capacity for mutation need not be random. Individual mutations may be. The "randomly chosen" mutation in each specific instance still follows the distribution of susceptability.
A uniform sample of two unequal regions will still have more points from the bigger region.
My point is that the term "random" does not imply a specific distribution.
This is what I was saying. I expressed it backwards, something I am rather good at.
"Individual mutations may be. The "randomly chosen" mutation in each specific instance still follows the distribution of susceptability.
Gotcha. Any mutations that occur in areas of susceptability occur at a locus that is random.
"A uniform sample of two unequal regions will still have more points from the bigger region.
"My point is that the term "random" does not imply a specific distribution.
I think I have it.