I read the article, twice. To me it reads like a typical, liberal anti-Bush tyrade. He throws in a few juicy tidbits about the cia you wouldn't expect, but overall the article is just another hit piece on the Bush Administration.
No Shrubbery! is right. There is, as we speak a gathering of momentum to get to the root of the W/Plame affair, and its genesis at CIA.
First it was just us, than some Bloggers, Now both zell Miller and Viki Toensing published in the MSM.....
WaPo, is generally careful not to get caught standing too far to the left.
That's what I thought from the first couple of paragraphs.
But I kept reading and decided the intial scolding tone was just liberal cover for what was to follow. I took that as Hoagland's saying, "I'm still no fan of the Bush White House, BUT..."
Again, I could be wrong. This piece could be tongue-firmly-planted-in-cheek. I'm still waiting to be convinced of that, though.
"To me it reads like a typical, liberal anti-Bush tyrade. He throws in a few juicy tidbits about the cia you wouldn't expect, but overall the article is just another hit piece on the Bush Administration."
Yes! The op-ed is "blaming the victim"?!!!
Yah, I agree there's a lot going on under the surface. Remember, W is always at least 5 steps ahead of the opposition.