Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judges: Alito Unlikely to Overturn Roe
Associated Press ^ | November 3, 2005 | HOPE YEN

Posted on 11/03/2005 9:39:55 AM PST by RWR8189

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Sounds like wishful thinking on their part...
1 posted on 11/03/2005 9:39:56 AM PST by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

AP trying to divide the conservatives again.


2 posted on 11/03/2005 9:40:47 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

It isn't going to work.


3 posted on 11/03/2005 9:41:26 AM PST by i_dont_chat (Houston, TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
"But in tens of thousands of cases that came before us, he faithfully showed a deference and deep respect for precedent,"

Duh! That's the entire point of being a judge on an inferior court.
4 posted on 11/03/2005 9:41:48 AM PST by Terpfen (Libby should hire Phoenix Wright.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

He will follow the law. Once he is on SCOTUS he will no longer be bound by Roe. Based on his history there is every reason to believe he will find it - as even Ginsburg has - to be ungrounded in the law.


5 posted on 11/03/2005 9:42:31 AM PST by thoughtomator (Alito Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I'm more worried about whether he'll help overturn McConnell vs. FEC (McCain-Feingold upheld).


6 posted on 11/03/2005 9:43:45 AM PST by Joe Bonforte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Maybe so, but there have been a few reports in the last couple of days that are kind of worrisome....that he voted pro-abort in three out of four cases, and then there's that college paper he wrote in favor of repealing sodomy laws.

A lot of people here keep saying none of that matters, that he's a real conservative, and not to worry about it. I hope they're right. Maybe they are.


7 posted on 11/03/2005 9:46:47 AM PST by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Roe will fall one way or the other. Science alone is killing it. A ruling that blatantly unconstitutional simply can't survive forever.


8 posted on 11/03/2005 9:48:55 AM PST by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Yep. Stare Decises didn't stop abolition of slavery. It shouldn't stop SCOTUS from overturning the law that allows the continued holocaust of the unborn.


9 posted on 11/03/2005 9:49:07 AM PST by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3

If you pierce the implications of the MSM and drill down to the details, you will see that there is nothing to justify apprehension on our part. As an appellate judge he was legally bound to follow SCOTUS precedent - he did not have the authority to overturn those precedents. So to say that he faithfully applied (bad) precedent doesn't mean he supports the original misruling. As far as his college papers go... that was 1971 - he was 21, and is 55 now. If he held a pro-sodomite belief for nearly 35 years there would be more evidence - most importantly, more recent evidence - of it.


10 posted on 11/03/2005 9:50:23 AM PST by thoughtomator (Alito Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
There's no question he's going to move the Supreme Court to the right because he is conservative," said former Judge Timothy Lewis, an appointee of the first President Bush who typically voted with liberal members when he served on the 3rd Circuit from 1992 to 1999.

WTF was Bush 41 doing when it came time to appointing judges? It appears that he contacted Gloria Steinham, Elenor Clift and Barbara Boxer and asked for their recommendations.

11 posted on 11/03/2005 9:58:36 AM PST by double_down
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
"Sounds like wishful thinking on their part..."

I certainly hope so.....

12 posted on 11/03/2005 10:01:43 AM PST by TAdams8591 (It's the Supreme Court, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
The defeated liberal media: "OK since we cannot defeat Alito we have to create all the lies and make sure that this pick will divide the Republican base as we have seen in the Miers nomination."
13 posted on 11/03/2005 10:04:32 AM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Unfortunate then. We've lost too many millions because of that terrible ruling.


14 posted on 11/03/2005 10:05:25 AM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
They said he has great respect for precedent-setting decisions and none of them offered that he would be likely to vote to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion.

Many people, including the author of this piece it seems, believe that before Roe, abortion was illegal and that if it is overturned, abortion will be illegal again.

My understanding is that Roe simply made abortion legal nationwide. The point being that some states had legalized abortion before Roe and if Roe is overturned, the decision on abortion would return to the states. Do I have that right?

It is nothing more than scare tactics to suggest that overturning Roe would make abortion illegal.

15 posted on 11/03/2005 10:06:57 AM PST by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
This is so predictable it is boring. I can't believe their are writers out there drooling over themselves to publish articles like this and thinking it will fool conservatives.
16 posted on 11/03/2005 10:08:03 AM PST by msnimje ("People for the American Way have issued a Fatwah against Alito" --- John Cornyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The bad news: Neither Alito nor Roberts would be likely to overturn Roe v Wade imminently. There are only four pro-lifers on the bench, and immediately overturning precedents as soon as you get a fifth conservative would destroy the authority of the Supreme Court.

The good news: The economy is still holding back its strength. The chances of the economic cycle maturing and expiring before '08 are closed to nil. Productivity in the last three years exploded at its greatest rate since just after World War 2. There will be an economic surge, and conservativism will surge. Screw the current polls; the '08 cycle looks excellent for a Republican president, and given the latest spat within the party, we may actually pick a stronger conservative than Bush. I cannot imagine Stevens and Ginsburg holding out until '12, in the face of further uncertainty of who will hold the White House even then, and given demographic trends, the Democrats taking the Senate seems very unlikely for the next generation.

CONCLUSION: It may take several years, but we will get 6 or even 7 conservatives on the court. Only then will Roe v Wade be overturned. When it goes, even Kennedy (if he is still around) may join the majority for the sake of maintaining the court's authority.

RECOMMENDATION: Conservatives should not yet aim directly at Roe v. Wade. Roberts' conditions for overturning stare decisis may carry the day for several more years. In the meantime, conservatives need to make sure that overturning Roe fulfills those conditions. We have to find cases that highlight the inconsistencies behind Roe. The liberals have always dominated "test cases," but if the GOP holds onto the presidency 7 more years, the federal court system will lurch abruptly to the right, giving us the power to bubble up ideal test cases.


17 posted on 11/03/2005 10:09:53 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Scalia, for instance, has disappointed conservatives by voting to uphold flag-burning.

Not this conservative.

Alito has written opinions that outlawed a school anti-harassment policy barring demeaning comments about race, religion or gender as overly broad; and struck down a state law barring companies from buying alcohol ads in college newspapers.

Sounds good.
18 posted on 11/03/2005 10:10:23 AM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
I believe his mama!

HA!

19 posted on 11/03/2005 10:12:57 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete

Yes you have it right. Several states legalized abortion years before Roe v. Wade.


20 posted on 11/03/2005 10:13:03 AM PST by thoughtomator (Alito Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson