Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Baynative
I've heard about this entry before, but I don't see that the inclusion of her NAME is in any way related to releasing her clandestine occupation.
30 posted on 11/03/2005 8:34:39 AM PST by garyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: garyb

If a reporter were trying to identify Wilson and everything about him in order to understand why the CIA would send him on a mission to Niger, one thing the reporter would explore would be Wilson's wife and her occupation and political ties. Wilson's Who's Who entry gives his wife's name. A political contribution database gives her political donation info and the name of her company. Novak was quick to identify her company as a CIA front. Was he told about it? Was it easily discernable to those familiar with CIA operations? I would like to know these things.


38 posted on 11/03/2005 9:41:04 AM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: garyb

"I've heard about this entry before, but I don't see that the inclusion of her NAME is in any way related to releasing her clandestine occupation."

My view is that the law states that in order for an agent to be considered covert, then the government must be actively trying to conceal his/her connection to the US government.
Married to a former ambassador, and NSC member, and a man who writes an NYT op-ed piece saying he worked for the CIA on a mission to Niger. Was there any activity by the CIA to conceal her connection to Joe Wilson?


40 posted on 11/03/2005 10:15:50 AM PST by RWE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson