[A-10]

>>>What about homofaggots, whose healthcare costs far outstrip every other know classification. >>>

What evidence do you have to support this? Or is this just justification to support your obvious anger issues?

You seriously doubt that a high-risk group like homosexuals could have a comparable health care cost to the non-high-risk population?

Things like rampant meth use, unprotected sex with multiple anonomous partners, fisting, felching, foreign body insertion, feces consumption etc probably would have no affect on healthcare costs in your estimation, right? Yikes!

We'll skip the anger issue portion as it is not applicable, joiky.

[HairOfTheDog]

Things like rampant meth use, unprotected sex with multiple anonomous partners, fisting, felching, foreign body insertion, feces consumption etc probably would have no affect on healthcare costs in your estimation, right? Yikes!

You love thinkin' about this stuff, huh!

~rolls eyes~

[TaxRelief]

Could you please substantiate some of your claims with statistics or evidence of some kind? Thanks.

[sandbar]

>>>You seriously doubt that a high-risk group like homosexuals could have a comparable health care cost to the non-high-risk population? >>>

Define "non-high-risk-population". No more risk than white trash or inner city ghetto trash.