Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NavVet
The university claims the ban is necessary because some students might not feel RAs who lead Bible studies are "approachable.”

So some students are prejudiced against Christians and the school wants to support them in their bias? That's real open minded of them!

33 posted on 11/02/2005 11:59:17 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Unam Sanctam

The undertone is here that R.A.s are expected to deal with students who are sexually active or considering sex, and may be charged with making condoms available. The college is probably worried that an R.A. who makes himself a Christian leader within the dorm would not be trusted by students who are testing their limits (and in some cases, the law) with sex and alcohol. The point of R.A.s is that they're the "cool" front line of defense for an administrator expected to keep these students from killing themselves by doing something stupid.

And to anticipate the response I'll get to that, loads of freshmen have sex and drink beer their freshman year without dying as a result, so I don't think that taking away an R.A. they're comfortable talking to would actually save lives.


76 posted on 11/02/2005 12:23:34 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson