[highball]

The problem is this example doesn't support the idea of a higher level species with new features, evolving from a lower level species.

No, the "problem" is that evolution doesn't have to be from a "lower level species" to a higher one. That's either a misunderstanding or a "misstatement" of what evolution is.

[aimhigh]

No, the "problem" is that evolution doesn't have to be from a "lower level species" to a higher one. That's either a misunderstanding or a "misstatement" of what evolution is.

So sustained mutation without improvement is considered evolving. You say evolution now has evidence, but the evidence doesn't support the goal, which is to support the theory that man evolved from apes. Sounds like a liberal argument using apples and oranges.