To: Junior
A frog is a frog is a frog. What is your point? Did the frog sprout wings and fly? No? Hmmmm.....
80 posted on
11/02/2005 12:34:49 PM PST by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
You really don't understand evolution, do you?
94 posted on
11/02/2005 12:54:46 PM PST by
Junior
(From now on, I'll stick to science, and leave the hunting alien mutants to the experts!)
To: mlc9852
"A frog is a frog is a frog. What is your point? Did the frog sprout wings and fly? No? Hmmmm..... You want big jumps at a higher taxon? Look at the fossil record. You want incremental cumulative change in the fossil record? Look at extant species.
You can't have it both ways.
Either you accept large saltation events, complain about extant species but accept the fossil record as evidence, or you accept the incremental cumulative change model (as we believe) but keep on whining about the 'gaps' in the fossil record. Either way, one has to be taken as evidence of evolutionary change.
126 posted on
11/02/2005 1:14:23 PM PST by
b_sharp
(Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
To: mlc9852
A frog is a frog is a frog. What is your point? Did the frog sprout wings and fly? No? Hmmmm..... Don't you think you're overly simplifying things here? There are a variety of frog species. Do you really consider all of them to be the same?
198 posted on
11/02/2005 2:25:30 PM PST by
Palisades
(Cthulhu in 2008! Why settle for the lesser evil?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson