Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Antonello
I was referring to an ongoing infection of a population, or resistance thereto. Similar to the resistance europeans had to smallpox, but the Indians did not, only affecting the ability of the species to interbreed. The separate populations may be separated by viral infection as well.

Inherited disease is not one of Lamark's ideas, iirc, any more than congenital syphilis.

276 posted on 11/03/2005 10:02:13 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

But the genetic transmission of resistance to an infection would be Lamarckian, unless it was rooted in some genetically superior immune system. Then it wouldn't be specific to any particular disease.

P.S. I think you are referring to measles, not smallpox, with the American Indians. the American Indians never were exposed to measles until it was too late. Most Europeans had constant exposure to it and had developed an immune response. Bam! Not a natural resistance like partial sickle cell anemia does for Africans against malaria.


280 posted on 11/03/2005 10:25:33 AM PST by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe
I was referring to an ongoing infection of a population, or resistance thereto. Similar to the resistance europeans had to smallpox, but the Indians did not, only affecting the ability of the species to interbreed. The separate populations may be separated by viral infection as well.

Inherited disease is not one of Lamark's ideas, iirc, any more than congenital syphilis.

My point, for clarification, is that is more likely that exposure to a pathogen would be an environmental pressure that selected genetic mutations that favored survivability rather than a direct instigator of the genetic change itself.

Kinda just borrowing your Occam's Razor to split hairs, so to speak.

You are a little off regarding inherited diseases, however. Something such as congenital syphilis is not genetically inherited. Rather, it is a result of the child being directly infected in utero. Remove the pathogen and future progeny won't be infected. Other heritable maladies, such as sickle cell anemia, actually are a genetic predisposition that is passed on to future generations. These, however, are genetic defects, not pathogenic infections.

284 posted on 11/03/2005 10:37:21 AM PST by Antonello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe
"I was referring to an ongoing infection of a population, or resistance thereto. Similar to the resistance europeans had to smallpox, but the Indians did not, only affecting the ability of the species to interbreed. The separate populations may be separated by viral infection as well. "

Inherited resistance to virii is a good example of evolution in action.

310 posted on 11/03/2005 1:26:30 PM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson