[Thatcherite]

And here, all this time we thought it was the seismic data. Hmmmm. Have to have a talk with the guys in geophysics....

The OP, mlc852, on these threads has repudiated the earth sciences, because they show no evidence whatsoever for a global flood around 5,000 years ago. So she won't be interested in anything that the geophysics boys have to say any more than she is interested in hearing from the biologists. She also said, prior to that that her only argument is with evolution, so either (a) she is one confused bunny, or (b) she is one of the many creationists who calls all science that contradicts her religious beliefs "evolution". That particular inanity is more common than you might think. She has a lot of opinions about all kinds of stuff, but remains strangely (well, not strangely at all) evasive whenever the subject of creationists lying under oath in the courtroom comes up.

[Thatcherite]

Doh! Should have said misspeaking of course. It sounds so much less sinful. Misspeakers still get to heaven, I reckon.

[mlc9852]

I thought they were IDers and not creationists, though I have a hard time keeping them straight. And why would you think the flood happened only 5,000 years ago? Could have been much longer, couldn't it? And I love science. I often post interesting science articles. I just don't buy evolution as in humans came from ape-like creatures. I have stated the same thing over and over yet you continue to state things I have never said. And you have the nerve to complain about others lying. Maybe they lied, maybe they didn't. Are you familiar with depositions before a trial and then what is stated at trial? Often different because people forget things. But we will see how the judge rules soon and then we can stop having these silly arguments.