http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v437/n7063/abs/nature04004.html
Copyright laws prohibit the reproduction of large sections of the journal article here, however, I do have subscription access to it, so if you have any specific questions, I would be happy to answer them.
Cheers!
Thank you. I'll order it as soon as I can afford it, hopefully within the next two or three weeks.
The abstract doesn't allude to any relationship between speciation and evolution in this particular case. Does the full text do that, and if so, what does it say?
In a quote in the article, Hoskins admits to speculation, but the abstract doesn't mention that, so I'm curious about the extent of this speculation. But I'm not sure what questions to ask. I think I'd need to read their reasoning, and see what assumptions were used.
The article says there are significant differences between the males in the two populations, but only mentions two, neither of which seems major on the face. What does the full text say about this?
Also, does the full text provide any data about genetic differences between the two populations? Are there any genetic differences?